Grok says :
“Global warming and its associated impacts do disproportionately affect certain groups, including women, children, Black people, and the LGBTQ+ community.”
Grok says :
“Global warming and its associated impacts do disproportionately affect certain groups, including women, children, Black people, and the LGBTQ+ community.”
Okay, got it – grok says that straight, white, adult males are less affected by the global warming myth.
AI gets some things right. Donald Starsky and JD Hutch
https://youtu.be/_NojjH-jUu0
What makes black people live in areas
“more prone to environmental hazards”?
Do they have some negative 6th sense that makes them disproportionally chose those areas?
Why are those self destructive front beach property owners(you know,those places most vulnarable to waves,sea level rise,wind and other AGW stuff) usually not black?
How comes that the majority of black people live in areas
that are being run for decades by democrats
who are obsessed with helping black people
-yet they can not even protect them from climate?
Why do black people live since forever close to their most obsessed protectors
and yet they suffer from envitonmental things while their protectors do not?
And how comes that those people who originate from way warmer regions
and whose bodies have been adjusted for tens of thousands of years to way warmer temperatures are the most vulnarable to “extreme temperatures”
-temperatures considered normal in places of their origin?
If women are more likely involved in agriculture – that makes them more vulnarable to CLIMATE INDUCED ECONOMIC DISRUPTIONS(fear propaganda terms at its best).
How comes that food productions have been growing and
growing for decades?Steadily growing global food production can not happen in such a scenario,therefore climate induced economic disruptions went down.
It shows how misguided the would be masters of the universe are if they believe that AI will provide an infallible tool of global governance. It is impossible to predict a priori the reliability of an AI. But since, as Tony has demonstrated, it is so easy to generate obvious counter examples, it cannot be of the order of the one failure per million trials as is required. Bear in mind these are the techniques used in military automatic target recognition on which a decision to attack may be based. In reality, military commanders have an aversion to war crimes tribunals and only believe their human intelligence officers.
What about the alphabet/rainbow/letter people, Grok no mention them, Grok stupid.
What about dwarves, tall people, Inuit, Tibetans, and dolphins? Grok stupid.