How about he stops one tornado (or even a drop of rain) first, before he takes on the whole climate? He can’t change the weather this afternoon, but he can predict and control the climate in 100 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- D. Boss on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael L Dee on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Bob G on Mann Says He Was Correct
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
Not sure how much “policymakers” will like being talked to using “everyday concepts already in use in the insurance industry”…
Anyway, the answer is simple: “the greater the uncertainty, the greater the risk“? The greater the risk to do something stupid that would make the situation worse. Everybody should know by now that the Titanic might have survived a direct head-on hit against the iceberg, and in hindsight nobody should have slowed that ship down, or tried to change course.
I’m not sure why people can’t learn from history, but they don’t. And this climate argument is particularly bizarre. They wish climate to remain the same…..ostensibly so our lives will remain manageable, and we’re not forced to immediate adaptation. To obtain this, they insist on immediate action and adaptation.
Regardless of the validity of their views, this lack of logic requires I reject their assertions.
it’s worse than that. ..they insist on mitigation not adaptation thereby guaranteeing to select the worst possible course of action
it’s like if the captain of the Titanic had proposed against the threat of icebergs to send a letter to other ship captains running the same lanes asking them to drop buckets of warm water overboard
It’s Even worse than THAT, my friends. Their mitigation plan to the possible collision of the Titanic with an iceburg
is to jump naked into the frigid North Atlantic to escape the impact.
I know!! whatever happened to “adapting” to your environment? I won’t feel sorry for them when the SHTF
Baghdad Romm
One measly trillion? On the latest calc that is worth all of 0.0005 C.
Chicken feed.
I am completely uncertain whether the flesh eating Martians will land tomorrow, so as a precution we need to shoot 99.9 percent of the earths population so that there isn’t enough fresh, juicy flesh to be bothered stopping for.