How about he stops one tornado (or even a drop of rain) first, before he takes on the whole climate? He can’t change the weather this afternoon, but he can predict and control the climate in 100 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Allan Shelton on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- DD More on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Disillusioned on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Disillusioned on 65 Years Of Progress!
Not sure how much “policymakers” will like being talked to using “everyday concepts already in use in the insurance industry”…
Anyway, the answer is simple: “the greater the uncertainty, the greater the risk“? The greater the risk to do something stupid that would make the situation worse. Everybody should know by now that the Titanic might have survived a direct head-on hit against the iceberg, and in hindsight nobody should have slowed that ship down, or tried to change course.
I’m not sure why people can’t learn from history, but they don’t. And this climate argument is particularly bizarre. They wish climate to remain the same…..ostensibly so our lives will remain manageable, and we’re not forced to immediate adaptation. To obtain this, they insist on immediate action and adaptation.
Regardless of the validity of their views, this lack of logic requires I reject their assertions.
it’s worse than that. ..they insist on mitigation not adaptation thereby guaranteeing to select the worst possible course of action
it’s like if the captain of the Titanic had proposed against the threat of icebergs to send a letter to other ship captains running the same lanes asking them to drop buckets of warm water overboard
It’s Even worse than THAT, my friends. Their mitigation plan to the possible collision of the Titanic with an iceburg
is to jump naked into the frigid North Atlantic to escape the impact.
I know!! whatever happened to “adapting” to your environment? I won’t feel sorry for them when the SHTF
Baghdad Romm
One measly trillion? On the latest calc that is worth all of 0.0005 C.
Chicken feed.
I am completely uncertain whether the flesh eating Martians will land tomorrow, so as a precution we need to shoot 99.9 percent of the earths population so that there isn’t enough fresh, juicy flesh to be bothered stopping for.