Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- stewartpid on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Jehzsa on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Robertvd on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Walter on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast


Can we get a refund of the tax dollars spent if it’s not true?
Opps, Baghdad Romm forgot to mention it’s partly a comparison to climate models. And as anyone who’s taken the time to look into things knows climate models are found wanting when compared to the real world. You can make a computer model say anything you’d like it to say. You can make it show ice loss happening slower than in the real world. And then when compared to the real world the real world would show alarming ice loss.
As far as comparing ice loss to other places, there are factors like plate tectonics, land use, and natural cycles that cause ice in different location on earth to be lost or gained at different paces.
So what “bombshell” is there to see here Baghdad?
But don’t let stop you from exaggerating, Baghdad Romm. Go ahead and do more damage to your reputation.
OT
Japan quake, video of tsunami going inland, carrying autos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr1AvB3_2IA
Nuclear power plant state of emergency now, that’s why you don’t put nuclear power on fault lines!!!
the video is unbelievable. WUWT is relaying the news that a whole city in Japan is smashed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGag08dpOsc
21-2-11 — Piers Corbyn: Expect more earthquakes world-wide for next two years
http://www.weatheraction.com/displayarticle.asp?a=314&c=5
http://www.masterresource.org/2011/03/positive-externalities-co2/
55 benefits of CO2
Shuldn’t the Jet Propulsion Laboratory be working on things like, you know, propulsion?