He had an AK-47 and a 9mm Makarov within reach, but couldn’t get to them during the White House’s claimed long gun battle to reach him.
When Bin Laden was shot, in a room on the top floor of the house, he was not armed but had an AK-47 assault rifle and a Makarov pistol within reach, the paper said.
That was SLOW! Every account so far has its own problems with reality. We will end up with 40 versions of how the situation took place.
Steve,
Off-topic, but here’s something you might want to post:
Obama floats plan to tax cars by the mile
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/159397-obama-floats-plan-to-tax-cars-by-the-mile
Wonder how long from the time he heard helicopters, gun shots, etc
and he still didn’t grab a gun??
So much for taxing the rich…………
“According to the JCT analysis, 51 percent of all (US] households, which includes filers and non-filers, had either zero or negative income tax liability for tax year 2009. The committee also found that 30 percent of tax units actually made money off the income tax system for the 2009 tax year”
Look at # 9 of 22. I seriously doubt Obama Bin Landen was shot by one of the SEALS. He was zapped by a big ole high explosive round of some type, but not a rifle shot. Thats why they don’t want to show the photo of the body. It would blow their whole story apart.
http://abcnews.go.com/International/slideshow/photos-inside-osama-bin-laden-kill-zone-13508190
But why concoct a story at all…..
Keeping in mind, our Secretary of State lied about her daughter Chelsea being at the world trade center at 9/11 and lied about being under fire in Bosnia….
…the only reason we have not heard from our Vice-president is they cut his tongue out….
And the intelligence that led them to Osama was gathered by the same CIA agents…
…that our Attorney General Holder is prosecuting for gathering that information
Now what’s wrong with this picture?