Antarctica has a lot more sea ice than has ever been measured by satellites in the Arctic.
That is why alarmists have to close their eyes and pretend that they don’t see the southern hemisphere, and that their polar amplification theory is a joke.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
Meanwhile, up north…
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/17623/NASA-finally-admits-it-Arctic-cyclone-in-August–broke-up-and-wreaked-havoc-on-sea-ice–Reuters-reports-Arctic-storm-played-key-role-in-ice-reduction
But of course, the counter to that will be that the storm was caused by CO2. Just like, if next year, there’s NO storm, and no new record minimum, that will also be caused by CO2.
You got that one on the nose….see:
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/al-gore-sees-dirty-weather-ahead/
“The weather’s just that – dirty,” Mr. Gore said in the video, which was shown at the three-day Social Good Summit conference. “It’s fueled by dirty fossil fuel and misinformation.”
The only thing ‘dirty’, is the money…
I love the part about extreme weather events being fueled by disinformation.
I guess they feel they have succeeded in completely dumbing down the population. Now idiots believe hurricanes are stronger because someone, somewhere said something they didn’t like. Friggin witch burners!
The Arctic sea ice record the alarmists have been crowing about is a total fluke and has nothing at all to do with warming. Also, according to the MSM the penguins are dying and the Antarctic ice is desintegrating. These people are such phonies that it is sickening.
Piers Corbyn of http://www.weatheraction.com discusses the facts and fictions surrounding Climate Change, and Ice in the Arctic.
http://youtu.be/47ucpzabzFM
I agree that we are in a cooling period, no doubt (despite Anthropogenic global warming) just how much of this cooling and how harsh it will be, I don’t know yet, If cold kills, then it would be irresponsible and madness to be suggesting warmth for these winters ahead in the northern hemisphere.
So the average global temperatures must be going up due to CO2 because the North pole has melted a bit….
and…
The South pole doesn’t count? ….Right…
It’s a new definition of ‘global’ that I was previously unaware of.
Pay no attention to the Antarctic ice behind the curtain.
Animation of the cyclone in the Arctic in August
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3nW3C1F_Fw&feature=plcp
Reblogged this on Sparks ~Engineering and Science. and commented:
Must be um… Global um.. err heat. um…
Global stupidity
That’s it, ferkien stopidioty
The Antarctic is a huge area the size of the continental U.S. Of course there is enormous variation in weather patterns. There also is in the U.S.A The higher altitudes in the Antarctic are gaining ice whereas the lower latitudes are losing it, especially along the 500 mile long peninsulas. The overwhelming evidence is that the earth is warming far faster than predicted. Here’s part of an article by Andrew Revkin of the NY Times:
“In a news release one of the co-authors of the new study, James E.T. Channell of the University of Florida, echoes that point, saying: “The problem is that now we have added to the total amount of CO2 cycling through the system by burning fossil fuels. The cooling forces can’t keep up.” (Click here to read two news releases summarizing the work; a Popular Science post has more.)
I circulated the paper, under the journal’s embargo rules, to a variety of researchers focused on this question, including Hansen. Here’s the roundup of reactions:
Richard Alley, a longtime analyst of ice and climate at Pennsylvania State University
Interesting. David Archer and [Andrey] Ganopolski, back in 2004 [“A movable trigger: Fossil fuel CO2 and the onset of the next Glaciation”], used modeling to show that human CO2 is heading off ice ages for perhaps a long time if we keep burning [….]
Cochelin et al used a model of intermediate complexity to show that the orbital variations over the next 100,000 years are weak enough that even a little human CO2 remaining in the atmosphere is enough to keep the earth out of an ice age (“Simulation of long-term future climate changes with the green McGill paleoclimate model: The next glacial inception”).
So, overall, the idea that our CO2 is having a large impact on the climate that will last a long time, and exceed any natural trend to start a new ice age, is rather well established in the scientific literature…
ROFL
I raise you, ROTFLMAO.
When you read their stuff it’s like a fanatical religion isn’t it?
Model driven drivel. And yet another an idiot as its vehicle.
Does your computer feed you food pellets while you write this long winded drivel?
What? I thought all the science was settled…
This one must be more Heresy!
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2012/09/23/stratosphere.targets.deep.sea.shape.climate
Crap!
And more robust testing of the models…
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2012/09/19/climate.scientists.put.predictions.test
Hindcasting. Now that’s impressive. Maybe now they can build a model that will predict the 1964 World Series Champion. Can’t wait to see who won.
Being that Antarctic not only reached a daily record high but nearly broke it’s all-time satellite-measured record high last week this latest expansion should have actually pushed it over. Someone with a good dataset link might want to check that out.
Yes, these “warmests’ ” definition of global has a bit to be desired. It’s the same case with the GFC, it was restricted to western countries and had some minor effects on some Asian countries. If you take China, India and Africa out of the equation, that leaves less than half of the population with financial buggery, which means the GFC wasn’t global at all. The same goes for all this climate change BS that is based on MODELS!, not real life, and these ‘models’ are based on trends, based on 2 pieces of data which possibly, have nothing to do with each other, like average temperature vs population, of course it’s going to go up in the graph, but that doesn’t mean there’s any truth in it! You can manipulate data, in statistics, to what ever you want. It will be correct statistically and mathematically, but actually represents nothing and forecasts even less. I’ve experienced the coldest winter this year I ever have, that proves these engineered stats are bullshit.