Healthy (Low Carbon) Lifestyle

I live a very healthy lifestyle. I eat organic food and exercise several times a day. I don’t eat much meat, and the meat I do eat is free-range from humanely raised animals. As a result, I am in excellent shape and health for my age. As much fun as I poke at warmistas’ BS, I share a lot of their core values. A low carbon lifestyle is indeed a healthy lifestyle.

More than 1.1 million people have died in auto accidents since January 1, and tens of millions have been injured. Cars cause huge amounts of pollution and clog the roads with unhappy drivers. Idiot drivers keep crashing into me on my bicycle.

Hopefully we can all find common ground and make life better for everyone. We only have one planet and limited resources.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Healthy (Low Carbon) Lifestyle

  1. Scarlet Pumpernickel says:

    Organic food, you like Copper? They use it as a pesticide 😛

    • There is no substitute for total victory. says:

      They also use Roanoke, a pesticide first discovered by Amazon Indians (Not Amazonian Indians) and used to kill all the aquatic life in rivers and streams for only a tiny amount of human food. But what the hey, its Organic. Then there is all that Sulfur that is often stripped mined and used on Organic crops to kill spider mites.

      Then there is this little link.
      Warning!! Adult language and situations.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaDfP_HKNPI

  2. Ben D says:

    “We only have one planet and limited resources.”

    You are of course speaking for yourself,…. this planet doesn’t belong to humanity and you have no real choice in the matter of future destiny.

    FYI the space age is here and within a century or two, Terrestrial humanity will make the transition to a Solar species,… and beyond that a Galactic species.

    Asides from which one get’s the impression that you identify with your body as to what and who you are. Reminds me of some wisdom from the East…

    The ignorant don’t understand and think they are their body.
    The intelligent don’t understand and think they are a soul/spirit vivifying a body.
    The wise understand and are in harmony with the ONE that is ALL.

  3. Scarlet Pumpernickel says:

    The problem is though, if we want everyone to go back to organic, then we’ll have to clear all the remaining forests. As it’s only the mass production that’s keeping the world alive today. Only the inner city trendies can afford to have organic 😛

    • Gail Combs says:

      Interesting then that a contributor to the FAO’s Forum, Professor El-Tayeb, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus of Industrial Biotechnology at Cairo University commented that: “..currently available (GMO’s) mostly contribute negatively to poverty alleviation and food security – and positively to the stock market.”
      http://www.warmwell.com/gm.html

    • Gail Combs says:

      Also from Warmwell

      January 8 2008 ~ “Who will rid us of this pestilent farming?”

      Defra has dropped the word ‘farming’ from its title. The Telegraph today reveals that
      “Defra and the Treasury’s joint vision document of 2006 presented to the EU argued that supports for farming should be completely abandoned..”
      and the article reinforces the conviction in many minds that for the government, and for the Treasury in particular, farming is a drain on the country’s finances and we are in a “post agricultural era”. We can only repeat what we have already said today: at a time when oil industry executives themselves are admitting it isn’t going to be easy to meet future world oil demand, and the globalised system that brings in cheap food is increasingly unsustainable, the values of local food production and of self sufficiency need urgently to be reconsidered.

      The gloomy suspicion held by many was put forcibly into words by Mr Langrish:

      “The UK government no longer wishes to have anything more to do with agriculture; and thoughts of food security have, for the time being, disappeared.”
      Mr Langrish feels that if livestock numbers are drastically reduced then targets being chased on greenhouse gas reduction can be met.
      “It’s all part of Defra’s policy to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases. The UK government believes a reduction in livestock numbers will have a marked effect on the statistics. This is the logic of the asylum, where the lunatics are now completely in charge.” .
      James Withers, the deputy chief executive of NFU Scotland, is also quoted: “There is a culture within the UK government of target-chasing, particularly on environmental and energy issues. Fewer livestock will, obviously, mean less greenhouse gas emissions, but how on earth can presiding over a demise of livestock production be consistent with the other big national and international challenges? Environmental protection and reducing food miles, food security, healthy eating and high animal welfare standards rely on a sustainable farming industry throughout the UK.”

      March 6 2008 ~ “.. the beginnings of a full-blown food crisis..”
      Magnus Linklater in today’s Times notes that

      “…overall there is little sign that policy-makers have grasped the enormity of what has happened. The UK is now barely 60 per cent self-sufficient in food.. .Here then, one might imagine, would be an opportunity for Britain, with its long tradition of highly efficient farming, to begin filling the gap. …It is clear that the Government has yet to react to the dimensions of the looming world food crisis. It needs to begin a debate with the EU on the whole direction of Europe’s agricultural strategy and rethink it from scratch..”
      With the world only ten weeks away from running out of wheat supplies and the dawning understanding that the end of cheap energy really does threaten the growth on which our economy and our assumptions have come to depend, this is a timely article.

      Warwell also figured out that CAGW was a scam early on.

      “..The most respected economist in this field, Yale’s Professor William Nordhaus, estimates that the cost of the measures proposed by Al Gore would be $34 trillion (£17 trillion) – all resting on the belief that, unless we spend such sums, world temperatures are doomed to rise. <b.The events of the first two months of 2008 may lead us to wonder whether these people really know what they are doing.”
      http://www.warmwell.com/08feb24booker.html

  4. Pingback: Tweets that mention Healthy (Low Carbon) Lifestyle | Real Science -- Topsy.com

  5. Lazlo says:

    A reasonable statement, but don’t expect the watermelons to engage

  6. Jason Chevton says:

    Your credibility withers the more you expose your audience to your self-righteous proclamations. It’s obvious you have a streak of fanaticism that isn’t really very “healthy.”

    When you finally drop the pretense of “I’m better than all the rest of you” we’ll restore your link to our blog roll. Here’s the test: see if you can go a month without your self-serving, eco-granola boasting and we’ll reconsider.

    • I write about what is important to me. I really don’t give a FF what anyone else thinks!

    • Andy Weiss says:

      The fact that you don’t fit all the stereotypes of either the left wing or right wing shows that you are not obsessed with trying to fit in. That is to your credit. You are who you are and proud of it!

      • Scarlet Pumpernickel says:

        That’s the problem at the moment, it’s either too right or too left. Normal every day people are being sidelined, and they are the majority.

        I too exercise and eat healthy, but I don’t need all this ideological BS to make me feel special or to preach or to earn an income.

        We just finished with Bush’s BS about oil running out, terrorism, now it’s the world is going to explode scares. Both sides have their own scares to make their own people make money. We just lead normal leaders to lead normally. Soon the western countries will all have completely hung parliaments while their economies are in disarray.

        I agree, when you eat, if it didn’t walk or grow in the sun, you should eat it. You don’t need man to make your food, nature does a better job.

  7. PJB says:

    The world is like a gigantic bar fight.

    All you wanted to do was score with the barmaid but now you have to watch out for the louts around you throwing punches in every direction…..AND keep an eye on that guy who is sneaking around picking up money from tables and rifling the till.

  8. rjh says:

    @2:05 pm. Th th th thats all folks. Thats more than enough for me.

  9. Leon Brozyna says:

    Everyone has a lifestyle choice. My objection is when some enlist the aid of the State to force their values on everyone else. If I choose to hop in the car on impulse to head on over to the closest burger joint to gorge on Deluxe Bacon Cheeseburgers, even if it’s not the healthiest choice, I don’t want someone taking that particular pleasure away from me.

    BTW, your experience with drivers is not unique. I find that when I’m walking along the highway (it’s pretty rural out here), most drivers will maintain their position on the highway; some will cross the center line to steer clear of my presence (overly cautious in my view); then there are those few who seem to want to see how close they can get to me … I’ve seen them swerve to get as close as they can to the shoulder of the road without hitting me. I’ve adopted the attitude that whether I’m walking facing traffic or riding my bike with the flow of traffic, that I’m wearing a bullseye target, placed there for the benefit of those sad drivers who seem to suddenly feel empowered when within the safe confines of their cars … they can take out their pathetic frustrations on weaker targets (pedestrians and bicyclists). Maybe they like playing chicken when they think there’ll be to consequences to them … till they find themselves in court on charges of vehicular homicide.

    • Gail Combs says:

      That is the reason I gave up bike riding decades ago as well as jogging on the roads. My trainer and I even had some fool idiot drive our horses into the woods destroying the carriage trying to escape her. (I owned the wheelers and he owned the leaders)

      http://www.carriagemart.com/pictures/pic3673.jpg

      As you can see a wagonnette sits high enough to be above the backs of the horses and you can look DOWN into a car so it should have enough road presence to demand respect from cars. It also let me see the driver had her head under the dash while searching in her purse for a cigarette. The purse sat on the floor on the passenger side.

      Despite that Ed was the one ticketed and held to blame for the accident because the wagonnette wheel tracks were in the middle of the dirt road going around a corner several thousand feet from the accident site. Never mind that the car was almost off the road on the left and was 100% plus in our lane. No wheel tracks for the car just four eye witnesses. (Daddy of course was a local big wig and his darling daughter would lose her license with one more ticket)

      http://www.towniescarriagehireltd.co.uk/images/wagonette-Break.png

      However as rah will tell you the modern drivers have no respect for vehicles that can easily kill them. Friends with motorcycles have told me cars will try to run them off the road too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *