RealClimate: Polar Amplification
The Arctic just had their coldest summer on record, so Gavin must believe that we are headed into an ice age.
COI | Centre for Ocean and Ice | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
Recent Comments
- Tel on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- Gamecock on “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- conrad ziefle on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Terry Shipman on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Bob Gutjahr on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- dm on “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gamecock on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
“Bipolar amplification” usually refers to those that dubiously claim greater climate change than scientific observation/raw data demonstrate in support of a change in global funding.
Reblogged this on Health Science Watch.
‘“Polar amplification” usually refers to greater climate change near the pole compared to the rest of the hemisphere or globe in response to a change in global climate forcing’
Gibberish.
There has been no climate change near the pole.
There has been no climate change anywhere.
It happened after the low levels of Arctic ice during the WWII years
http://hidethedecline.eu/pages/posts/arctic-sea-ice-data-collected-by-dmi-1893-1961-259.php
*and* after the low ice during the beginning of the 60’s, leading to the maximum of 1978.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/arctic-ice-growth-since-1971/
It’s happening now as it did back then, modulated by the intensity of solar radiations.
Over on WUWT, Anthony has a blog post showing polar ice sequencing from 1958 to present.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/08/08/according-to-this-dmi-temperature-plot-the-arctic-has-dropped-below-freezing-about-two-weeks-early/
Could someone please show me the Polar Amplification? I just don’t see it.
It got warmer than average in the arctic in the summer in the 90’s, but not anymore.
Strong solar radiations forcing of the present cycle 24, we’re starting to see its effects.
Thanks for the link to WUWT.
Try these on for size. Winter setting in.
http://weather.unisys.com/gfs/7d/gfs_1000_7d.gif
http://weather.unisys.com/gfs/10d/gfs_1000_10d.gif
It’s kind of like the Dome of Silence from Get Smart. There’s an invisible barrier which lets CO2 in, but doesn’t let it back out. The winds that start at the poles, stay at the poles and…..oh, I just can’t do it – the intellectual contortions needed to make this kind of theory work are just too hard.
“Polar Amplification” has everything to do with the volume of noise coming from the warmists now the game is up, and nothing to do with temperatures. Extending the game extends the money supply. This was never about saving a planet that doesn’t need saving. It was all about introducing a method of global taxation, brought in exactly the same way personal income taxes were after WWI. Create the funding emergency and scare the people into changing the laws. In about 21 days the Australian Carbon Tax will be dead.
“The majority of the so-called climate change skeptics (as seen of TV and even popular best-seller lists) have been getting harder and harder to find in recent years as more and more evidence has stacked up against their opinion. When scrutinized most of the skeptics quite often lack creditability and are often book writing lawyers, TV weather reporters, or even if they might be scientists their field of expertise is not in the study of climate.”
This guy turned it up to 11. 😉
http://kenburridge.com/climate-crisis-comments-part-1/#comment-6965
I see that the article image post by Steve is from Cecilia Blitz of the University of Washington. On Dec 15, 2010 there was news report about a study with the headline:
And who was the co-author of the paper? Cecilia Blitz. They’ll soon call her a denier. 🙁
Jimbo, do you have a link to that?