http://climate.gi.alaska.edu/ClimTrends/Change/TempChange.html
Temperatures in Alaska have plummeted 2.5 degrees since 2004. There is no integrity behind the global warming movement. A movement dominated by lunatics and charlatans.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
Recent Comments
- Tel on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Gordon Vigurs on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Jack the Insider on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Bruce of Newcastle on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Bob G on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- Gamecock on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- arn on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- oeman50 on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- D. Boss on Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
Lunatics, charlatans, and mercenaries – got to keep those grant $’s coming!
Once They Get Started Making Things Up, They Just Can’t Stop
It is like peeing. You hold it in as much, but once it starts,…
The Bladder is only so large but it seems they have the bladder of a race horse or an elephant.
HOW TO BE A SCEPTIC
“Temperatures in Alaska have plummeted 2.5 degrees since 2004.”
You should always be sceptical of comments like this. You should still be sceptical of comments that say ‘decade’ or ‘century’ but if you see a specific year chosen, a true sceptic should realise that this is likely to be a cherry pick to spread misinformation.
So true sceptics should look at other, perhaps adjacent years to confirm how true the statement stands up. So for example, if it doesn’t hold up for 2000 it should be dismissed for nonsense.
I leave any true sceptics to check that much out for themselves.