Antarctic Ice Above Normal 83% Of The Time Since Mid-2007

Posted on November 29, 2010 by Tony Heller

It mirrors the Arctic.

Arctic ice in red below, flipped across the x-axis and shifted by six months to normalise the seasons. The Arctic and Antarctic seem to move opposite each other.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Antarctic Ice Above Normal 83% Of The Time Since Mid-2007

  1. suyts says:
    November 29, 2010 at 5:42 pm

    Yeh, its weird ever since the march of the penguins……..

    Reply
  2. John Silver says:
    November 29, 2010 at 10:34 pm

    I wonder what the r squared is for that.

    Reply
  3. R. de Haan says:
    November 29, 2010 at 11:13 pm

    At this moment the US NCSID seems to be cooking the books showing the current sea ice extent below 2007 values.
    Very convenient to have this disinformation up during the climate negotiation in Cancun.
    http://www.accuweather.com/video.asp?channel=vbbastaj

    Reply
  4. Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
    November 29, 2010 at 11:32 pm

    There is no relationship. The earth is out of balance. That’s what James Hansen says. We have to act now to get it, maybe, if we even can, back into balance. If we can get the earth back in balance then you can start talking about relationships between North Pole and South Pole. Until then let’s hope Cancun gets the world on the right track. Enough of this graphs crap. Graphs won’t help. North Pole ice is disappearing.

    ;O)

    Reply
    • sdcougar says:
      November 30, 2010 at 3:32 am

      And what is the major factor in making N. Pole ice disappear? Wind.

      And WHATEVER the state of the ice, Cancun cannot do anything about it.
      As one of th world’s leading climate scientists stated, “One of the things the scientific community is pretty agreed on is those things [i.e. CO2 reductions] will have virtually no impact on climate no matter what the models say. So the question is do you spend trillions of dollars to have no impact? And that seems like a no brainer.” Prof. Richard Lindzen, MIT.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJwayalLpYY

      Reply
  6. G Kaplan, MD says:
    January 5, 2011 at 11:45 pm

    It is sad that the few dissenters of global warming are placed at the forefront of news casts.
    This implies that this Decembers 190 nations agreement that we do have global warming, caused by overpopulation is a hoax.

    How can you seriously believe that all nations are wrong and Drs. Lindz, Dowlatabadi and Rush Limbaugh are correct?

    In a planet where 17 million die annually due to hunger and lack of potable water, 1 out of 5 go to bed hungry in the USA every night, where 60% of the world’s population is malnourished, 75%of wild fish has been already harvested, over 80% of forests have been fallen for agriculture and meat, where acid rain, draughts, hurricanes, floods and forest fires are ubiquitous. In a planet where 40% of the polar caps have already melted and agribusiness causes 50% of global warming can we pretend this is not true?

    All these symptoms must be addressed before it is too late. If we keep on disagreeing, it will be too late and science and all our might will be unable to revert this calamity.

    The worst calamity is that we predict we will add 2 BILLION more people to our exponential population growth in the next 20 years.. How can we feed and shelter them when we are already unable to feed all of the 6.8 billion we already have?

    This is not only an ecologic question but a moral question, for our survival depends on what we do now. Even if all the parlamentarians are wrong, let us take steps NOW to prevent any catastrophe and be wrong, than find out when it is too late.

    Reply
    • stevengoddard says:
      January 6, 2011 at 1:01 am

      Take your meds. 300 years ago most people died before 30. Smallpox, TB, Typhoid, Plague, Flu, Tooth Infections, Ingrown Toenails, War, Childbirth.

      Quality of life has increased vastly for billions of people.

      Reply
    • Baa Humbug says:
      January 6, 2011 at 1:30 am

      I’m guessing the MD in G Kaplan MD stands for Manic Depressive.

      Because you sure ain’t intelligent enough to be a doctor. Gawd I hope you’re not a doctor coz if you are, then more people are in danger FROM YOU than there will ever be from GW

      Reply
    • peterhodges says:
      January 6, 2011 at 2:17 am

      and all of these are symptoms of poverty, not CAGW

      Reply
  7. G Kaplan, MD says:
    January 5, 2011 at 11:49 pm

    THE UN IN CANCUN MET DECEMBER 2010

    ALL NATIONS AGREED GLOBAL WARMING IS A THREAT TO OUR SURVIVAL
    PARTS OF THE KYOTO ACCORD HAVE BEEN RATIFIED .

    BOLIVIA VOICED DISSAPPROVAL OF THIS AGREEMENT CLAIMING IT IS TOO MILD AND THE CALAMITY CANNOT BE PREVENTED WITH SUCH MILD AGREEMENT

    Reply
    • Mike Davis says:
      January 6, 2011 at 1:56 am

      Your dose level needs to be adjusted. This is further proof that second level antipsycotics are not as effective as first level and both need to be carefully monitored for effectiveness.

      Reply

  8. Pingback: Ice Escapades | Skeptical Swedish Scientists

  9. G. Kaplan, MD says:
    February 27, 2013 at 12:44 am

    When opposing sides want to refute facts, since they have no basis to do so, they ridcule or demonize. This proves their ignorance is showing.

    NASA’s Chief Dr. James Hansen explains in this short video about WHY CLIMATE CHANGE IS SERIOUS AND UNLESS WE ADDRESS THIS, THERE WILL BE NO HOPE FOR HUMANITY.:

    http://www.ted.com/talks/james_hansen_why_i_must_speak_out_about_climate_change.html

    President Clinton Concurs when lecturing to US Mayors.:

    http://www.blinkx.com/#v/clinton-addresses-climate-change-summit/8a-LVh8Zq74621myXNCLicA

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *