Climate scientists are writing a model to blame weather events on corporations.
The secret weapon that could finally force climate action | New Scientist
This motivated me to write my own weather attribution model, which blames weather events on specific companies – including sciency sounding explanations.
You can try it out here at this link. It is good for a few minutes of entertainment:
Corporate Weather Attribution Generator
I dreamed it, therefore it is real. Doesn’t matter. It’s easy to start a Climate Cult subreligion. There are so many believers out there seeking a charismatic leader.
” Is this the TOOL we need to effectively persecute …. ”
It is very rare that these bastards are that honest.
It’s not science, justice or a matter of facts, wrong or right, but a TOOL.
That’s why they were so busy to declare co2 a pollutant – once you get away with such a perversion anything goes.
But here is a little problem: In a field where a butterfly flap is supposed to create a hurricane / or not,
In a world where a gigantic hurricane can be just a day away without experts being able to detect or predict it –
but than somehow to be able to pin this hurricane down on a specific company? This is peak charlatanry.
A tool that can connect specific anomalies to specific companies is impossible.
Even the atheist god of superdeterminism would not dare to go there.
As of now I would guess we are not even able to do such a thing on a most primitive basic level
(spray 5 drops on a window, and repeatedly predict which drop will run down first with 50% accuracy ).
PS
The picture above is missing a sickle.
I’m not sure it is charlatanry. It could be total incompetency with logic, understanding of science, and inability to understand magnitude and scope. I.e., they really believe that butterfly wings can cause a hurricane on the other side of the world, that they can kill an elephant with a Red Rider BB gun, and that they really are deserving of a better life.
You mean they have knowledge but no wisdom?
That’s kind of what defines the woke
and maybe it was the marxist intention all along to create drones that know the price of everything and the value of nothing
and it is that kind of people that universities produce by the millions.
Yet I think in this case it’s evil, not incompetence.
If he were? talking Obama/Mamdani stuff and about a better world or revolution I’d go along.
But this is super-complex stuff (and not some toiletslogans or changing some economical parameters,)
where neither the level of distribution nor the locations are known,nor when it is released and for sure not how it gets dispersed? .
Some companies release co2, others only dig it out of the ground, others sell it to the masses, other don’t even sell to average Joe and others get their energy from nuclear power plants with no co2 emissions at all.
On top of that the biggest co2 emitter is not a company but the US military.
And I also highly assume (didn’t even bother to look into it),
that these listed companies are all US/western companies,
and that this is just a further racist white guilt trope
and that 90%+ of emitters and emissions are being ignored
in favor of the great narrative.
As I can not imagine that all of this combined is just result of incompetence(there is no excellence in incompetence) and that he is just a megalomaniac retard I’d say here is a manipulative character with some serious egoproblems at work.
Doesn’t know what a woman is but has a skill to pin down hurricane X to 96% on Exxon.
That’s evil imo.
I disagree ARN. the biggest emitter of CO2 in the United States is the American people. Now, to save the planet, or at least the United States, everybody please hold your breath. lol
Americans are doing this since the times they dealt with Newsomes Smelt.
The Club of Rome demonstrated way back in the 1970s that computers are excellent bullshit amplifiers. When microcomputers emerged in the ’80s into the domestic market, most owners acquired some skill at coding, and computers lost the mysticism they originally had when they were only used by banks, governments and universities. Unfortunately, with naive users accessing the processing capability through apps, rather than understanding of how the devices work, this mysticism has re-emerged, so the public can be once again be conned by results whose only merit is that they were generated by computer.
The most mystical thing about computers is that,
no matter how powerful they become and how complicated they get,
their predictive capabilities in terms of environment and climate
are still as shitty as they were during their most primitive era of CoR’ s
World3 program.
On the other hand: We were able to land on the moon with those primitive computers now we no longer are.
The old mysticism is well deserved.
My cousin was the computer operator for NASA during all those flights in the 60’s and 70’s. His job was to make sure that the computer never went down, or if it did, it was back up as quickly as possible. He had a little room off the main floor, which you can see on the left side when they are looking down at all of the operators in the Houston Flight Control center. He passed a couple of years ago.
Your family seems to be very techy.
Wouldn’t be surprised if your 1st name is Zuse related.
Landing on the Moon had more to do with graph paper and slide rules. In those days, the intelligence was in front of the screen (more likely, line printer and card reader). Nowadays it is assumed to reside within the computer, with the result it actually exists on neither side of the screen.
Spot on .
That’s because you can’t mathematically model something which has hundreds (perhaps thousands) of variables, each of which has a near infinite range of possibilities.
I always had the evil assumption that they have chosen climate as vehicle because of that.
So many variables
and it were weather models that revealed to Lorenz that even the tiniest changes can massively change the outcome.
Which means that some consensus scientists with an activist attitude can come up with any scenario the politicians wants them to deliver.
And the more complex the system, the easier to get the wanted outcome and hide the manipulation.
In the past models were written once the calculations became too difficult to do manually, i.e. AFTER considerable understanding of the phenomenon concerned had been gained, and indeed the analytical solutions would be used as test cases during validation. A model specification must identify the processes which are most relevant to the phenomenon of interest and appropriate governing equations. Unfortunately, that is the information which the study the model is supposed to support is seeking. Thus the process is iterative, and usually limited in scope to specific phenomena, gaining undrstanding at each stage. What we have at present is more akin to Tarot card reading, complete with the mystic bullshit needed to bamboozle the technically naive.
I have been doing simulations for many years in engineering field.
And because in engineering if you make a mistake people die, all simulations must be corroborated by a nice huge test: take ultimate loads on airplanes, crash safety in cars and so on.
and where 1:1 models are not feasibles (for instance buildings, bridges) then designers use safety factors up to 5.
I have modified results to make structures that were not safe appear safe “on paper”, because my supervisors needed positive results for a while, but of course then, passing from prototyping to pre production items, we had to introduce modifications (and invent justifications “we could not predict before”) in order to correct what we all knew was wrong.
So, simulation can tell you everything and the contrary of everything: it’s just you to choose the direction.
Now, you can easily do the same with climate models, whose predictions are visible only in 20-30 years. In 20-30 years nobody will remember the model’s prediction. And even if someone remebers it, the autor of the model will aready be retired and happy owner of a sea view villa next to that of Obama, laughing at the idea that the sea should have already risen and flooded the villas…
🙂
When you consider the amount of rig testing, hardware in the loop and full scale trials needed to develop an engineering product, you can appreciate just how laughable climate models are.
This may be a bit off subject but it is weather related. one of my favorite documentary films… you can find it on YouTube… it’s building the Mighty Mac. that’s referring to the bridge that was built in late 1950s that connected lower Michigan to upper Michigan across the Mackinac straits. I’ve been there several times and to Mackinac Island and it’s a gorgeous place to be… in the middle of summer. I came across the documentary tonight and watched it again because I love it…im shocked to find, in one of the early years of construction they were able to keep working until January 14th. the weather was unseasonably warm until Jan 14.. how can that be? a warm December/ January 65 years ago? I thought the weather experts told us that was the ice age. https://youtu.be/C07hGxEij3M?si=zJOvQexQ3fY3lnT2
Inspiring documentary. Compare and contrast the attitude that the laws of nature which people feared are the very same laws mankind can exploit to his benefit with the current mental paralysis which seeks to obstruct progress at every turn.
it is a great story…. as is the building of the Golden Gate bridge in California. no doubt both structures would be canceled today because there might be a new biracial bisexual somewhat retarded minnow discovered originating from that tiny plot of buildable bridge land. lol. long live the minnow! while I have your attention …very very cold weather is forecast for the upper Midwest for the next two weeks. yikes!!!! my furnace is 20 years old and I’m hoping for the best…. and I’m not kidding…. please furnace, give me a couple more years!
Folks, it’s that time of year again. no, not the college football championship. it’s that time of year when North America typically feels it’s coldest temperatures. but it’s also the same time of year that we hear of so-called record unheard of off the scale hot hot extremely hot days in Australia, as it is their summer. I haven’t heard a peep. I just looked at the 10-day forecast for Sydney Australia. highs in the seventies and lows in the 60s. I thought Al Gore said Earth has a fever. hmmm…. maybe not.