Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
Recent Comments
- Greg in NZ on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Mike on NPR Climate Experts
- Mike on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
Isn’t that the same place where ancient civilizations has cities further up the mountains and were wiped out by the LIA and the ruins still exist. If memory serves ne South America is over run with ruins from lost civilizations that were wiped by extreme weather events one or more thousand years ago.
While truthful, the article fails to provide a realistic view as the current link is that Climate change can only be cased by humans, therefore it is a lie of omission. Just like the IPCC reports!
Mann proved that there was no variable weather before 1900.
What article did Mann prove this with Goddard? Are you talking about a 12 year old paper? I’m pretty sure his most recent reconstruction (2008) has quite a significant amount of variability.
You’re bringing up a tired argument. Why won’t you just let go of MBH98 and accept that better techniques have been developed that provide better answers. I guess that wouldn’t fit into the plot you are trying to frame would it? The fact that you rehash these arguments like that without any warranting just give credence to the mainstream belief that you are a perpetual spin machine. Mislead, divert, repeat, Mislead, Divert, repeat.
Why did anthony watts shut down a forum one time because you wouldn’t admit you were wrong?
Robert:
It is really simple if you stop to think about it: There are those who still defend the 1998 paper the its offspring.
If climatologists would provide retractions for ALL the fabricated BS they have produces to support AGW.
The person attempting to mislead and divert is you. Better techniques have not been used just better ways to distort reality and promote a lie.
Learn to live with reality or be buried by it. Your faithfulness in the fantasy is admirable. There are people that are fans of Dragon World which is as real as Mann’s work.