Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
Recent Comments
- Crashex on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Robertvd on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Jehzsa on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Greg in NZ on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Trevor on “records going back to 1961”
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Climate Scamming For Profit
- arn on Climate Scamming For Profit
Isn’t that the same place where ancient civilizations has cities further up the mountains and were wiped out by the LIA and the ruins still exist. If memory serves ne South America is over run with ruins from lost civilizations that were wiped by extreme weather events one or more thousand years ago.
While truthful, the article fails to provide a realistic view as the current link is that Climate change can only be cased by humans, therefore it is a lie of omission. Just like the IPCC reports!
Mann proved that there was no variable weather before 1900.
What article did Mann prove this with Goddard? Are you talking about a 12 year old paper? I’m pretty sure his most recent reconstruction (2008) has quite a significant amount of variability.
You’re bringing up a tired argument. Why won’t you just let go of MBH98 and accept that better techniques have been developed that provide better answers. I guess that wouldn’t fit into the plot you are trying to frame would it? The fact that you rehash these arguments like that without any warranting just give credence to the mainstream belief that you are a perpetual spin machine. Mislead, divert, repeat, Mislead, Divert, repeat.
Why did anthony watts shut down a forum one time because you wouldn’t admit you were wrong?
Robert:
It is really simple if you stop to think about it: There are those who still defend the 1998 paper the its offspring.
If climatologists would provide retractions for ALL the fabricated BS they have produces to support AGW.
The person attempting to mislead and divert is you. Better techniques have not been used just better ways to distort reality and promote a lie.
Learn to live with reality or be buried by it. Your faithfulness in the fantasy is admirable. There are people that are fans of Dragon World which is as real as Mann’s work.