Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Isn’t that the same place where ancient civilizations has cities further up the mountains and were wiped out by the LIA and the ruins still exist. If memory serves ne South America is over run with ruins from lost civilizations that were wiped by extreme weather events one or more thousand years ago.
While truthful, the article fails to provide a realistic view as the current link is that Climate change can only be cased by humans, therefore it is a lie of omission. Just like the IPCC reports!
Mann proved that there was no variable weather before 1900.
What article did Mann prove this with Goddard? Are you talking about a 12 year old paper? I’m pretty sure his most recent reconstruction (2008) has quite a significant amount of variability.
You’re bringing up a tired argument. Why won’t you just let go of MBH98 and accept that better techniques have been developed that provide better answers. I guess that wouldn’t fit into the plot you are trying to frame would it? The fact that you rehash these arguments like that without any warranting just give credence to the mainstream belief that you are a perpetual spin machine. Mislead, divert, repeat, Mislead, Divert, repeat.
Why did anthony watts shut down a forum one time because you wouldn’t admit you were wrong?
Robert:
It is really simple if you stop to think about it: There are those who still defend the 1998 paper the its offspring.
If climatologists would provide retractions for ALL the fabricated BS they have produces to support AGW.
The person attempting to mislead and divert is you. Better techniques have not been used just better ways to distort reality and promote a lie.
Learn to live with reality or be buried by it. Your faithfulness in the fantasy is admirable. There are people that are fans of Dragon World which is as real as Mann’s work.