More Comedy From The Met Office

Dr Pope says the slowdown in temperature rise is consistent with projections from climate models. She also says she expects warming to increase in the next few years.

Sure it is.

“There are a number of things that are affecting short-term temperatures. A lot of the heat could be distributed to the deep oceans and we don’t know what’s going on there.

Must be all that hot water sinking. Can’t disagree about the part in bold though.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11841368

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to More Comedy From The Met Office

  1. Malaga View says:

    The comedy propaganda seems to be running 24×7 in the run up to Cancun… if it wasn’t so sinister I would be laughing… but I remember the proverb He who laughs last, laughs longest… so please keep up the great work… and I guess today is the right time to state that I am very THANKFUL that you started this blog.

  2. Stefan says:

    The evidence is in the deep unknown ocean?

    Kangaroo court!

  3. trucker bob says:

    “the heat could be distributed to the deep oceans and we don’t know what’s going on there.”

    rather than anticipating the missing heat being in the deep oceans, she would be better served if she had someone check between her ears for a dangerous build up of hot air.

  4. Malaga View says:

    The Daily Mash is usually good for a grim smirk….

    BRITAIN TRAPPED UNDER TWO FEET OF GLOBAL WARMING BULLSHIT

    http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/britain-trapped-under-two-feet-of-global-warming-bullshit-201011253286/

  5. Glen Shevlin says:

    Just wondering …

    ” A lot of the heat could be distributed to the deep oceans and we don’t know what’s going on there.”
    If you can not explain what is happening in the largest heat sink on the planet…

    HOW IN HELL CAN YOU CLAIM TO BE ABLE TO PREDICT THE FUTURE TRENDS OF CLIMATE.

    Rant off, apologies needed to vent

  6. slimething says:

    Excuse me, but wasn’t the anomaly method supposed to be sufficient to measure global temperatures? I recall reading the number of thermometers or spatial coverage “doesn’t matter”; it’s only the change in temperature over time that mattered. I recall reading knowing the absolute temperatures in one location compared to another isn’t important.

    The anomaly method was supposed to fix everything. Just a few thermometers in fact could determine global surface temperatures.

    Now I’ll have to learn all over again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *