Can the party of Reagan accept the science of climate change?
By Sherwood Boehlert
Friday, November 19, 2010
Watching the raft of newly elected GOP lawmakers converge on Washington, I couldn’t help thinking about an issue I hope our party will better address. I call on my fellow Republicans to open their minds to rethinking what has largely become our party’s line: denying that climate change and global warming are occurring and that they are largely due to human activities.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Tricky concept. They won the election by promising to end government waste and fraud, and the author wants them to go back to waste and fraud.
What does Reagan have to do with this?
It’s illogical to expect logic from these illogical types.
You should challenge this guy to a debate. Make him put up or shut up. I mean if he’s going to insist on walking through life with his fly open, might as well make an example of the putz.
Probably be the only useful act of his life.
In that sense you’d be doing him a favor.
Invoking Reagan is an attempt to tug at our emotions. Oddly, though, those of us that remember, Reagan was anti-hysteria. Especially when it came to environmental alarmism.
I call on my fellow Republicans, to hunt and root out these treacherous impostors.
This is what he wants us to sign on to…. http://thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1877-ipcc-official-climate-policy-is-redistributing-the-worlds-wealth.html
“What does Reagan have to do with this?”
Dear Ronald was pro-business and pro-America. He knew the country was already in the environmental dog house because of acid rain and the US was by far the biggest producer of greenhouse gases in the world so he commissioned a third report about global warming. He also overruled skeptics about the effects of ozone-depleting chemical to pursue the Montreal Protocol.