Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
That’s got to be a blow. The media actually informing people about the science.
Climate science – screw observation, trust my toy computer model.
your idea of observation is to look out the window and assume that is a good measure of global average temperature
It is so freakin hot out there
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/ANIM/sfctmpmer_01a.fnl.30.gif
The temperatures don’t matter now, all that counts is the next hot week in New York or New Delhi, when the voices of the Church of the Global warming are amplified to an ear-splitting shrill.
Note to global warming activists out there: Don’t dress up in polar bear outfits on hot days to demonstrate, that’s a really stupid thing to do.
Cthulhu: missing the point one observation at a time
“The media actually informing people about the science”
Nice one Chthulu. Did you get it out of a Christmas Cracker?
Errr, doesn’t the media have to demonstrate a particular knowledge before they can “inform”?
Wildly flapping your arms, running around, screaming the “the sky is falling” doesn’t qualify as “informing” in my book.
Cthulhu says:
December 27, 2010 at 4:39 pm
“That’s got to be a blow. The media actually informing people about the science.”
Actually, what they’re saying is: Don’t investigate or debate further, just take our word for it – you’re responsible, and Marxist rationing will fix it.
If you ignore the scientific evidence of climate change….
….they get no money
So then why do the klimate kranks scream AGW everytime that there is a drought?
Record lows set for Miami, Key West…
http://www.weather.com/outlook/driving/interstate/map/USGA0028?bypassredirect=true&mapdest=US_Lows_Tonight:SE
There is nothing out there that is not within the realm of what has happened in the past or what one can normally expect. There are no signs of impending doom, for anyone else other than “climate experts”.
The all knowing all seeing climate models `
“who are you going to believe? Me? Or your lying eyes?”
Climate sceptics don’t use their memory we have data of past weather which sometimes has not been adjusted by AGW scientists.It has never been proved that more co2 is causing the Earth to warm to any significant extent why should we take action against a non existent threat,why should we have to except your metaphysics that the Earth is bound to warm greatly by 2100.Judging by 2010 even if we do get average global warming of six degrees by 2100 it is likely that it will all occur in Greenland and north western Canada ,Europe and most of the USA will be unaffected by this average temperature rise.
That article appeared in the opinion sections of the (un)fairfax websites. Usually, the opinion articles have a comment section to allow readers to comment.
In recent times, CAGW sceptics have been running rings around the global warming congregation. This must not have impressed the congregation members employed at (un)fairfax having their believing readers being outclassed by the sceptics.