Most of the world may be begging for some promised global warming in a few weeks.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/images/fnl/sfctmpmer_01a.fnl.anim.html
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Peter Carroll on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
Don’t they say global warming shows up first at the Poles? The South Pole is one of the Poles, isn’t it?
The SP doesn’t matter anymore, just as ocean heat content is not mentioned once in Hansen 2010 ‘Global Surface Temperature Change’ http://tinyurl.com/2euuk2n , but it was all the rage in 2005 when Hansen called it the ‘smoking gun’ proof for AGW. In fact, Hansen said OHC was the true metric to measure global warming, not SAT, but since that metric (OHC) isn’t looking so good for Warmology and is getting more difficult to fiddle with those numbers to agree with ModelE (although a few have tried), the SAT is still an easy target as all GISS needs to do is claim UHI etc. is well accounted for; it’s up to everyone else to prove the negative.
I suspect in a number of years the importance of the SP will change places with the NP. That’s the beauty of an irrefutable hypothesis.
Remember when Greenland was the ‘canary in the coalmine’? Nary a mention of that anymore either. Is there anything north of the North Pole when that fails too?
It’s going to be very hard for them to create a hottest year even next year.
hottest year ever, not hottest year even
Oh no doesn’t the Sahara go green then?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090731-green-sahara.html
Surely some mistake here… finding Met Office and Climate Experts in the same headline… its an oxymoron… surely time to rename the Met Office into something more appropriate… something like AGW Orifice… any other suggestions?
Deep Purple – Smoke on the Water
Smoke on the water, fire in the sky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUwEIt9ez7M