Most of the world may be begging for some promised global warming in a few weeks.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/images/fnl/sfctmpmer_01a.fnl.anim.html
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “falsely labeling”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Don’t they say global warming shows up first at the Poles? The South Pole is one of the Poles, isn’t it?
The SP doesn’t matter anymore, just as ocean heat content is not mentioned once in Hansen 2010 ‘Global Surface Temperature Change’ http://tinyurl.com/2euuk2n , but it was all the rage in 2005 when Hansen called it the ‘smoking gun’ proof for AGW. In fact, Hansen said OHC was the true metric to measure global warming, not SAT, but since that metric (OHC) isn’t looking so good for Warmology and is getting more difficult to fiddle with those numbers to agree with ModelE (although a few have tried), the SAT is still an easy target as all GISS needs to do is claim UHI etc. is well accounted for; it’s up to everyone else to prove the negative.
I suspect in a number of years the importance of the SP will change places with the NP. That’s the beauty of an irrefutable hypothesis.
Remember when Greenland was the ‘canary in the coalmine’? Nary a mention of that anymore either. Is there anything north of the North Pole when that fails too?
It’s going to be very hard for them to create a hottest year even next year.
hottest year ever, not hottest year even
Oh no doesn’t the Sahara go green then?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090731-green-sahara.html
Surely some mistake here… finding Met Office and Climate Experts in the same headline… its an oxymoron… surely time to rename the Met Office into something more appropriate… something like AGW Orifice… any other suggestions?
Deep Purple – Smoke on the Water
Smoke on the water, fire in the sky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUwEIt9ez7M