Most of the world may be begging for some promised global warming in a few weeks.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/images/fnl/sfctmpmer_01a.fnl.anim.html
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Honeybee Collapse Update
- “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- William on “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- arn on Compassion For Terrorists
- Hank Phillips on Compassion For Terrorists
- Michael Spencer on Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Disillusioned on Honeybee Collapse Update
- arn on Honeybee Collapse Update
- Gamecock on Honeybee Collapse Update
- arn on “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
- Disillusioned on “a live-animal market in Wuhan, China.”
Don’t they say global warming shows up first at the Poles? The South Pole is one of the Poles, isn’t it?
The SP doesn’t matter anymore, just as ocean heat content is not mentioned once in Hansen 2010 ‘Global Surface Temperature Change’ http://tinyurl.com/2euuk2n , but it was all the rage in 2005 when Hansen called it the ‘smoking gun’ proof for AGW. In fact, Hansen said OHC was the true metric to measure global warming, not SAT, but since that metric (OHC) isn’t looking so good for Warmology and is getting more difficult to fiddle with those numbers to agree with ModelE (although a few have tried), the SAT is still an easy target as all GISS needs to do is claim UHI etc. is well accounted for; it’s up to everyone else to prove the negative.
I suspect in a number of years the importance of the SP will change places with the NP. That’s the beauty of an irrefutable hypothesis.
Remember when Greenland was the ‘canary in the coalmine’? Nary a mention of that anymore either. Is there anything north of the North Pole when that fails too?
It’s going to be very hard for them to create a hottest year even next year.
hottest year ever, not hottest year even
Oh no doesn’t the Sahara go green then?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090731-green-sahara.html
Surely some mistake here… finding Met Office and Climate Experts in the same headline… its an oxymoron… surely time to rename the Met Office into something more appropriate… something like AGW Orifice… any other suggestions?
Deep Purple – Smoke on the Water
Smoke on the water, fire in the sky
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUwEIt9ez7M