Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Typical nutcases
When I read the headers, I had a fright thinking that the sceptics must have behaved abysmally and right out of character. What a relief to find that it was just the warmists once again behaving within their character. They’re keeping the splatter-gate dream alive.
Were they wearing James Hansen t-shirts?
Again, when you are an AGWer, and you look at who is on your side of the debate, from Osama Bin Laden to poo flingers… if that does not tell you that you are wrong, then no amount of actual science and proof is going to sway you.
If people were dumping poo in the streets because they were sceptical of AGW, I would then be certain AGW was real, because people who dump poo in streets are wrong before they open their mouths.
Gimmi back my 80 million you poo throwing bastards!
I seem to remember that the Magic Climate Bus was parked outside a Macdonalds in the previous Calcun photo. Do we have our culprits?
P.S. Maybe they were just recycling.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/dec/12/cancun-agreement-rescues-un-credibility
So the UN says that it’s saved it’s own credibility? But they say they want to save the forests but see the next article in the link below
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19817-deforestation-not-so-important-for-climate-change.html
Trees not important?? Which is it UN????
Oh no, Trees are good now, http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-12-greener-climate.html
Which is it, good or bad?
Why did trees try to unhide the decline?
Dunno, I guess the tree rings really prove something is fishy from 1970s onwards as they don’t match the satellite data anymore
“Under UN definitions palm oil can count as forest. The scientists believe this may be why Winrock’s estimate of emissions in south-east Asia is so low.”
So basically with the UN, palm oil or Evo’s Mother Earth Coco plantations count as pristine forest
I hope someone told the Orang Utangs that their habitat has perhaps changed a bit, but is still forest, so they can go back there and stop getting extinct.