Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Mac on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
Typical nutcases
When I read the headers, I had a fright thinking that the sceptics must have behaved abysmally and right out of character. What a relief to find that it was just the warmists once again behaving within their character. They’re keeping the splatter-gate dream alive.
Were they wearing James Hansen t-shirts?
Again, when you are an AGWer, and you look at who is on your side of the debate, from Osama Bin Laden to poo flingers… if that does not tell you that you are wrong, then no amount of actual science and proof is going to sway you.
If people were dumping poo in the streets because they were sceptical of AGW, I would then be certain AGW was real, because people who dump poo in streets are wrong before they open their mouths.
Gimmi back my 80 million you poo throwing bastards!
I seem to remember that the Magic Climate Bus was parked outside a Macdonalds in the previous Calcun photo. Do we have our culprits?
P.S. Maybe they were just recycling.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/dec/12/cancun-agreement-rescues-un-credibility
So the UN says that it’s saved it’s own credibility? But they say they want to save the forests but see the next article in the link below
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn19817-deforestation-not-so-important-for-climate-change.html
Trees not important?? Which is it UN????
Oh no, Trees are good now, http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-12-greener-climate.html
Which is it, good or bad?
Why did trees try to unhide the decline?
Dunno, I guess the tree rings really prove something is fishy from 1970s onwards as they don’t match the satellite data anymore
“Under UN definitions palm oil can count as forest. The scientists believe this may be why Winrock’s estimate of emissions in south-east Asia is so low.”
So basically with the UN, palm oil or Evo’s Mother Earth Coco plantations count as pristine forest
I hope someone told the Orang Utangs that their habitat has perhaps changed a bit, but is still forest, so they can go back there and stop getting extinct.