http://www.pnas.org/content/107/48/20697.abstract
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
Together with this paper reported by The Hockey Schtick:
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/11/paper-compelling-evidence-of-cosmic-ray.html
there have been two peer reviewed studies providing strong support for Henrik Svensmark’s Cosmic Ray Theory in the last two weeks.
Meanwhile, Nigel Calder, Svensmark’s co-author of The Chilling Stars, has hinted (see http://calderup.wordpress.com/2010/10/23/whoosh-not-missing-just-busy/ ) that we may soon see the first results from Svensmark’s experiments at CERN.
I think heads are exploding at RC.
“there have been two peer reviewed studies providing strong support for Henrik Svensmark’s Cosmic Ray Theory in the last two weeks.”
What kind of support? Whether or not cosmic rays have affected the climate in the more distant past, they cannot explain our planet’s recent warming. Direct measurements of cosmic ray intensity going back as far as 50 years show no downward trend coinciding with the recent warming.
You don’t seem to have grasped the way it works. As cosmic ray intensity rises, impacting our atmosphere more, due to less solar magnetic output, that tends to shield the earth normally, the neutron content of cosmic rays interacts with ozone and O2 to form H2O. We get more low level clouds, and more precipitation.
As to recent warming, this has not even been as warm as the Medieval warming, it has been due to the sun in both cases, and right on schedule, with this new solar system orbital epicycle the Holocene is ending. The “mini ice age” that is predicted to last 20 or 30 years by IPCC scientist Mojib Latif will not have ended likely before the 70,000 year glaciation cycle predicted by renowned Croatian Physicist and ice age expert Professor Vladimir Paar to begin within 5 years or so is well underway. In actuality of course it’s really likely the same cycle for practical purposes. The deep solar quiet will simply continue “unexpectedly extended” or come and go with pauses, plateaus and minor warming moments, as the global chill gets deeper and deeper over time. Behind it all is the factor that the core of the sun is not a pure hydrogen fusion plant. Because it is “neutron repulsion” it responds to these orbital variations in our solar system with fluctuating output. Was it Milankovitch who saw the orbital cycles as being behind it all? We know a bit more but not all. Why is the volcanic activity kicking up right at the start of this glaciation cycle? We know it can accelerate cooling with ash and SO2. I don’t see it as coincidence. By the way, the recent discovery that the Arctic ice has been thinned by warmer water, due to volcanic eruptions like that of Pompeii beneath it in the Arctic Basin is someday going to be found as part of the natural cycle. That’s my thought anyway.
Look like they are soaking up some nice sun in Mexico, while they scheme how to pinch energy from the poor
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q83CQ_7CGCg&feature=player_embedded
By the way, global warming will halt all the snow, but in the case it produces lots of snow, it’s also global warming, understand, its a simple concept, everything is global warming
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/8178162/Are-we-freezing-because-of-global-warming.html
Scarlet Pu………..
There are two kinds of snow:
Cold snow, that snow that snowed pre 1980 due to global climate stasis
Hot snow, due to man-made global warming. It’s the snow that is covering the northern hemisphere atthe moment, same that covered it last winter (second largest snow cover ever).
In fact I have produced snow in my house. I have set the thermostat up to beat the current global warming freeze and my house froze up. So I’m in a fix. I don’t know how to heat my house and I’m gonna freeze to death because of heating my house a little bit more, due to the current semi global freeze-up resulting from CO2 caused global warming.
Maybe I ll fill up my house with CO2… never thought of that before.
So what about 1930-40s snow?
What about the snow that stopped the Germans invading Russia before? Was that the cold snow or the hot snow?
http://www.myfoxorlando.com/dpps/news/offbeat/spanish-woman-claims-she-now-owns-sun-dpgonc-20101126-gc_10808147
Maybe we should ask the new sun owner if she can flick the switch and make it colder again?
Speaking of cycles
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/5816606/El-Nino-weather-system-to-return.html
OMG what El Nino will come back one day, I thought it never ever would ever ever come back ever again?
Time for a $100 million study to check if it might come back, also check if the sun will rise tomorrow as well? Maybe check if it might rain again?
The Daily Mail is getting its ducks in a row
What happened to the ‘warmest year on record’: The truth is global warming has halted
Last week, halfway through yet another giant, 15,000delegate UN climate jamboree, being held this time in the tropical splendour of Cancun in Mexico, the Met Office was at it again.
Never mind that Britain, just as it was last winter and the winter before, was deep in the grip of a cold snap, which has seen some temperatures plummet to minus 20C, and that here 2010 has been the coolest year since 1996.
Globally, it insisted, 2010 was still on course to be the warmest or second warmest year since current records began.
But buried amid the details of those two Met Office statements 12 months apart lies a remarkable climbdown that has huge implications – not just for the Met Office, but for debate over climate change as a whole.
Read carefully with other official data, they conceal a truth that for some, to paraphrase former US VicePresident Al Gore, is really inconvenient: for the past 15 years, global warming has stopped.
Would be good if Al Gore was forced to pay back $30billion of wasted money, I mean he accepted the Nobel Prize and took in the cash for the movie, so he should be accountable?
So, correlation is causation. Whoda thunk it.
One of my biggest complaints with the AGW theories was the disregard of input energy. I would havethought that one of the major drivers of any system is the energy input into the system. Is it possible that AGW exists ? Yes it does heat islands around cuties prove that rather conclusivly up to the point that the heat islands stop. The rst of the climate change system has to ahve a relationship with the input energy, and ignoring it leaves a huge hole in the theories. It looks like that hole got a little bit smaller
Pingback: Ancora su clima, Sole e raggi cosmici | Climate Monitor