That explains why GISS shows winter temperatures plummeting over the past decade.
These maps don’t include the current winter.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
I guess that’s why its called “Skeptical Science.” Because he’s skeptical of science, and likes to substitute it with his own version of things.
This afternoon it was 59 in Nassau, Bahamas and 55 in Key West. Ideal beach weather with our warming climate!
The only human fingerprints in his diagram are the two labelled “more fossil fuel carbon [sic]…”. There’s still no empirically proven connection to the other things he has labelled, regardless of whether or not they’re actually happening anyway.
He also has a hard time separating fantasy from fiction. Models are not “evidence”; they’re theories, and they’re consistently getting it wrong, which makes them doubly worse.
Help! I am totally confused. Isn’t there a new paper that suggests global warming will result in colder, snowier winters in the Northern Hemisphere?
Actually there is research suggesting that, though not widely accepted by climate scientists as far as I know.
What do you suppose would happen if you looked at trends longer than “the past decade,” as Cook did? Say, CRUTemp 1850-2009 or UAH 1979-2009?
Just curious.
They would have to get their heads out of the sand to do that.
How about it Steve? Why not publish a proper and credible summary of the longer trends to see if Winter is warming faster than summer.
Given that winters have been cooling very rapidly over the last decade, that seems like a foregone conclusion.