Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
if only he meant it was getting colder, he would be correct.
jeff masters is on a par with romm in charlatan-hood. can’t stand that guy.
Munich Re-
“Our immediate response to future increases in weather-related catastrophes as predicted by some climate scientists is to dramatically increase premiums today. In the less likely event that future catastrophes exceed historical averages, we shall maintain attractive returns for investors. In the more likely event that future catastrophes remain within historical averages, we shall provide very attractive returns for investors and improved performance bonuses for our high-level executives. Everyone wins.*”
*well, almost everyone.
The very reason that reinsurance groups are behind the Chicken Little Brigade and sponsoring stupid stunts like the Catlin Arctic Charade!
I believe the term is the “CNN” effect…we instantly report ever weather event, and many times a day for added affect.
Who destabilises weather, er climate? From Joe Bastardi.
MONDAY PM
A MIND BOGGLING FACTOID ABOUT HOW SMALL MAN ACTUALLY IS
From an email from Peter Wraxall, who made one of the most concise common sense arguments as to why the climate is cyclical I have ever read. But the last paragraph blows me away:
“It is theorized that 106 Billion people have been born into this World in total. By my calculations (which could easily be wrong)…..if all 106 Billion people were represented as a standard adult dressed in black…standing 4 persons per metre squared…..you would only black out an area the size of Wales in the UK……then remember that only 6 to 7 Billion people are currently alive at present.”
Wow!
I don’t know what is wilder, that, or the temperatures around London last night?
Ciao for now. ****
The only instability is between his ears…….
….I can’t stand Masters, I’m sure he still wets the bed
Now, Now the calm of emptiness cannever be mistaken for instability,unlessit is right before the big bang/
Weather and climate have always been unstable and always will be in the future.
I found this weather chart from 6th. February 1947, which looks remarkably similar to the synoptic conditions which have prevailed over the last 4 weeks, (note the anomalously high temperatures over Eastern Canada).
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gesc_b/Pages/NorthAtlanticPages/NH6feb.html
Nothing to see here, people. It has all happened before, and with atmospheric CO2 levels at 305 ppm to boot……
Damn. Try the link again :
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gesc_b/Pages/NorthAtlanticPages/NH6feb.htm
I read the headline as “Romm Becoming Unstable.” Sorry, my bad. ;P
I watched Joe on a televised “debate” once with Marc Morano and Joe became so shrill, hyperventilating while spitting trying to get his words out, that I thought they were going to have to terminate the program.
Such “public nervous breakdown” episodes are just unbearable to watch
Well, that’s the moniker these days.. it’s no longer about warming, since that has essentially stopped..
It’s now that the climate is now “unstable”, by repeating stories of snowstorms, floods and heatwaves and saying how dangerous they are, despite those kinds of things happening since climate came into existence.