Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
“Should the press start investigating to discover the truth, or promote bad science?”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
IDK, it is much fun to make MSM look ridiculous while exposing flaws in the warmistas logic. If the press actually started doing its job, then we’d have to find something else they refuse to investigate.
The press should do what the press does best; promote bad science.
Maybe the mainstream media is still united on a ‘conspiracy’ to report nothing but items supporting AGW, but this unity is becoming more fragile each day. Everyone knows how fickle the media is, and how they are ultimately driven to out-scoop each others for ratings gains. If they smell blood in the water about this entire so-called crisis being in imminent collapse, they will turn on each other and the AGW promoters in a heartbeat, no doubt with yells of being hoodwinked or assuming other news outlets had initially checked the voracity of the science everyone else relies on. It could get spectacularly ugly.
They could start by blaming each other for never checking the voracity of the accusation against skeptic scientists going back to 1996: “How an Enviro-Advocacy Group Propped Up Global Warming in the MSM” http://bigjournalism.com/rcook/2010/11/02/how-an-enviro-advocacy-group-propped-up-global-warming-in-the-msm-a-nov-2-election-connection/
Is it corruption, stupidity or insanity? Probably a healthy dose of all three.
The answer is: Climate Change Seminars
The press has been systematically brainwashed by climate seminars organized by the UN and the World Meteorological Organization, Met Office and even big Press Agencies like Reuters.
http://notrickszone.com/2010/12/30/international-conference-communicating-disaster-spreading-climate-propaganda/
Also read the comments for further links
We have to stop thinking this is not a conspiracy.
It is a conspiracy and all involved have been bribed and brainwashed.
It’s a quasi-religious system of belief. Conspiracies are more clandestine.