“four years from now, the globe will start to cool again, as it did from the middle ’40s to the middle ’70s.”
Other professors at CSU tried to run him out of the department for his heresy. Looks like he may be the best climatologist in the world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
you are basing this on which measure of mean temperature?
I’m taking the dogs out for a walk now. It is -11F.
The hottest freakin year ever.
Do you even know what you are talking about Tony Duncan?
Considering all the predictions made in the last twenty years about the future of the climate, Dr. Grey’s has come closer than anyone else.
Now we have to wait another 25 years to see who will predict another rebound in temperature and claim its due to the price of tea in China.
The group that considers that to be the most likely future scenario is larger than is advertised because most of the time they are shouted down and their work is not published in “PAL” review as it does not fit the “Consensus”. There are a lot of pet theories for why but mainly the scenario is close to the variable nature of historic climate that will not change. This is the same as during the 70s but the Global Warming crowd drove out the real researchers!
You know that you misunderstood their projected scenarios! Right? The climatologists were right all along it was the Media that misquoted them!
Bill Gray’s problem is that he spent much of his career actually measuring data in the field and learning to understand what it means.
That’s sooooo 20th century.
“Everybody” knows that you’ve gotta have a computer “model” now to understand and forecast the “system”.
As a geologist, I infer that fossil logs recovered from beneath a melting (retreating) glacier must contain information about warmer times in the past (i.e., before the frikkin glacier formed).
If I were a paleoclimatologist, I’d understand that the ring widths and isotopic ratios from the fossil trees needed to be “adjusted” to conform with the computer model – which shows conclusively that the Medeival Warm Period never happened.
Q.E.D.