“four years from now, the globe will start to cool again, as it did from the middle ’40s to the middle ’70s.”
Other professors at CSU tried to run him out of the department for his heresy. Looks like he may be the best climatologist in the world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
you are basing this on which measure of mean temperature?
I’m taking the dogs out for a walk now. It is -11F.
The hottest freakin year ever.
Do you even know what you are talking about Tony Duncan?
Considering all the predictions made in the last twenty years about the future of the climate, Dr. Grey’s has come closer than anyone else.
Now we have to wait another 25 years to see who will predict another rebound in temperature and claim its due to the price of tea in China.
The group that considers that to be the most likely future scenario is larger than is advertised because most of the time they are shouted down and their work is not published in “PAL” review as it does not fit the “Consensus”. There are a lot of pet theories for why but mainly the scenario is close to the variable nature of historic climate that will not change. This is the same as during the 70s but the Global Warming crowd drove out the real researchers!
You know that you misunderstood their projected scenarios! Right? The climatologists were right all along it was the Media that misquoted them!
Bill Gray’s problem is that he spent much of his career actually measuring data in the field and learning to understand what it means.
That’s sooooo 20th century.
“Everybody” knows that you’ve gotta have a computer “model” now to understand and forecast the “system”.
As a geologist, I infer that fossil logs recovered from beneath a melting (retreating) glacier must contain information about warmer times in the past (i.e., before the frikkin glacier formed).
If I were a paleoclimatologist, I’d understand that the ring widths and isotopic ratios from the fossil trees needed to be “adjusted” to conform with the computer model – which shows conclusively that the Medeival Warm Period never happened.
Q.E.D.