The IPCC says all glaciers will be gone by 2035, but new studies say they will last until the end of the century.
I personally miss the days when Chicago was under a mile of ice. Damn that global warming.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Now I know where my Ouija Board disappeared to. I loaned it to Big Jim in 1987 and I have not seen it since!
At least when the glaciers finally recede, they can find all those houses, towns, and forests that are under them…………….
lol, well, its hard to make the argument that the world wouldn’t be better off without Chicago.
Steve, an alternate headline.
SCIENTIST SAYS MELTING ICE CAUSES LESS WATER!!!
“For the long term, it’s not good for the economy because there will be a drop in river run-off and less water in reservoirs,” says glaciologist Valentina Radic, a professor at the University of B.C. and the lead researcher.
It appears Margaret Munro will write anything if the price is right.
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Tightened+muzzle+scientists+Orwellian/3515345/story.html
http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/World+facing+extinction+crisis+scientists/3734827/story.html
“Holocene glacier fluctuations prior to the `Little Ice Age’ in Garibaldi Provincial Park in the British Columbia Coast Mountains were reconstructed from geomorphic mapping and radiocarbon ages on 37 samples of growth-position and detrital wood from glacier forefields. Glaciers in Garibaldi Park were smaller than at present in the early Holocene, although some evidence exists for minor, short-lived advances at this time. The first well-documented advance dates to 7700—7300 14C yr BP. Subsequent advances date to 6400—5100, 4300, 4100—2900 and 1600—1100 14C yr BP. Some glaciers approached their maximum Holocene limits several times during the past 10 000 years. Periods of advance in Garibaldi Park are broadly synchronous with advances elsewhere in the Canadian Cordillera, suggesting a common climatic cause. The Garibaldi Park glacier record is also broadly synchronous with the record of Holocene sunspot numbers, supporting previous research that suggests solar activity may be an important climate forcing mechanism. ”
http://hol.sagepub.com/content/17/8/1069.abstract
Sorry, but it’s behind a paywall, it was freeview when I first saw it.
Pictures of tree tree trunks left in the tongue debris, carbon dated for when they grew there, which is well above the current tree line.
Ho hum, nothing new….
If melting icecaps are going to be causing colder, snowier winters in the northern temperate zones (as the AGW spin doctors are now telling us), shouldn’t this be causing glaciers to be expanding?
If you read the fine print you will see “then again, maybe there will be 20% to 100% of the water added to the glaciers; we just don’t know. Yes, we are clueless headline seeking shills.”
wahahahhaha
More of the SOS. How tiresome!