h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Gordon Vigurs on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Bill on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bill on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Bob G on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Disillusioned on “the science is absolutely certain”
- Terry Shipman on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- arn on “the science is absolutely certain”
- czechlist on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- arn on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
Your link is not working. Here is a corrected link: http://climatequotes.com/
I got to the link by copying and pasting the url in my browser.
This is interesting information. Recommend everyone pass it on to their congressman.
That’s a great link. Thanks. It’s bookmarked.
USA Government Fiscal Year 2011 Climate Change Budget: USD$2,481 million! That’s USD$2.48 BILLION DOLLARS for Research Scientists to make the case that the climate changes… which we already know… as climate has changed on Earth for ~4.3 billion years…
Money well spent! Those damned peer reviews are expensive.
These budgets should immediately be cut in half. Then half again. This amount of money is insane.
What exactly does the DOE, for one, do anyway!!
Fund the SS CAGW CRU’s Director, Phil Jones.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/21/us-doe-apparently-funded-cru-millions-not-200k-as-reported/
I agree – THERE is 2.5 billion that could be cut to zero with no lasting detrimental effects – and more likely a positive outcome.
DOE manages all of the nuclear facilities used for generating nuclear bombs past and present effects, eg waste site cleanup, waste storage eg yucca mtn, etc etc. They also supervise research on all sorts of new methods of generating energy like cellulosic ethanol, fusion, etc.
Michael Mann needs to feed his kids somehow.
I’d be happy to get $50,000 for my research budget , verses $2500 …… but then I’m just a stupid skeptic.
I believe Jo Nova did a very good article on the $’s groups were getting. Can’t recall how long ago though.
Can we get funding levels back to what they were when CO2 was 350PPM?
No Pressure…