http://climatequotes.comh/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Your link is not working. Here is a corrected link: http://climatequotes.com/
I got to the link by copying and pasting the url in my browser.
This is interesting information. Recommend everyone pass it on to their congressman.
That’s a great link. Thanks. It’s bookmarked.
USA Government Fiscal Year 2011 Climate Change Budget: USD$2,481 million! That’s USD$2.48 BILLION DOLLARS for Research Scientists to make the case that the climate changes… which we already know… as climate has changed on Earth for ~4.3 billion years…
Money well spent! Those damned peer reviews are expensive.
These budgets should immediately be cut in half. Then half again. This amount of money is insane.
What exactly does the DOE, for one, do anyway!!
Fund the SS CAGW CRU’s Director, Phil Jones.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/21/us-doe-apparently-funded-cru-millions-not-200k-as-reported/
I agree – THERE is 2.5 billion that could be cut to zero with no lasting detrimental effects – and more likely a positive outcome.
DOE manages all of the nuclear facilities used for generating nuclear bombs past and present effects, eg waste site cleanup, waste storage eg yucca mtn, etc etc. They also supervise research on all sorts of new methods of generating energy like cellulosic ethanol, fusion, etc.
Michael Mann needs to feed his kids somehow.
I’d be happy to get $50,000 for my research budget , verses $2500 …… but then I’m just a stupid skeptic.
I believe Jo Nova did a very good article on the $’s groups were getting. Can’t recall how long ago though.
Can we get funding levels back to what they were when CO2 was 350PPM?
No Pressure…