http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2001/2001_Shindell_etal_1.pdf
When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Hey! How about that!
Remove CO2 sensitivity from GCM’s and their output starts to resemble reality!
I have not seen a reference of theirs since 2005 wherein the terminology “climate forcing” wasn’t synonymous with “greenhouse gas focing.”
I do not put much faith in any paper from that group. You do understand what they used to fit the models to? The Hockey Stick!
It is just another version of their fantasy to support their ACC agenda!
See we got this for that period but the same conditions are not evident now so something else must be the driver! Magic CO2 must be the answer!
Their BS has been going on since the mid 70s and this is just another in the line of needed misinformation research papers!
A larger problem with the paper is that it uses the Hoyt-Schatten TSI reconstruction which has been completely discredited. See pages 9-11 here:
http://www.leif.org/research/TSI%20%28Reconstructions%29.pdf
Obviously the brains of the outfit was Shindell. Schmidt did the typing, Mann and Rind looked after the punctuation and graph drawing and the chick posted the paper off to get published.
Wow.. colder temps in NH Winter during low solar activity. Sounds very familiar.
Sorry.. just remembered.. add La Nina to the equation..
As “Anything” said, who needs CO2?
MET, GISS, NOAA, UEA, BOW, NIWA, IPCC, and a whole S load of ECO nut jobs.
Dave :
The list is just to long to properly answer that question. It is past time to shorten the list!
When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?
Money
“When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?”
When they realized it wouldn’t serve to further the NEIO.
Opps, meant NIEO
Pingback: Di clima ce n'รจ uno solo! | Climate Monitor