http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2001/2001_Shindell_etal_1.pdf
When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Hey! How about that!
Remove CO2 sensitivity from GCM’s and their output starts to resemble reality!
I have not seen a reference of theirs since 2005 wherein the terminology “climate forcing” wasn’t synonymous with “greenhouse gas focing.”
I do not put much faith in any paper from that group. You do understand what they used to fit the models to? The Hockey Stick!
It is just another version of their fantasy to support their ACC agenda!
See we got this for that period but the same conditions are not evident now so something else must be the driver! Magic CO2 must be the answer!
Their BS has been going on since the mid 70s and this is just another in the line of needed misinformation research papers!
A larger problem with the paper is that it uses the Hoyt-Schatten TSI reconstruction which has been completely discredited. See pages 9-11 here:
http://www.leif.org/research/TSI%20%28Reconstructions%29.pdf
Obviously the brains of the outfit was Shindell. Schmidt did the typing, Mann and Rind looked after the punctuation and graph drawing and the chick posted the paper off to get published.
Wow.. colder temps in NH Winter during low solar activity. Sounds very familiar.
Sorry.. just remembered.. add La Nina to the equation..
As “Anything” said, who needs CO2?
MET, GISS, NOAA, UEA, BOW, NIWA, IPCC, and a whole S load of ECO nut jobs.
Dave :
The list is just to long to properly answer that question. It is past time to shorten the list!
When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?
Money
“When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?”
When they realized it wouldn’t serve to further the NEIO.
Opps, meant NIEO
Pingback: Di clima ce n'è uno solo! | Climate Monitor