http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2001/2001_Shindell_etal_1.pdf
When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
- arn on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Gamecock on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- czechlist on “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
Hey! How about that!
Remove CO2 sensitivity from GCM’s and their output starts to resemble reality!
I have not seen a reference of theirs since 2005 wherein the terminology “climate forcing” wasn’t synonymous with “greenhouse gas focing.”
I do not put much faith in any paper from that group. You do understand what they used to fit the models to? The Hockey Stick!
It is just another version of their fantasy to support their ACC agenda!
See we got this for that period but the same conditions are not evident now so something else must be the driver! Magic CO2 must be the answer!
Their BS has been going on since the mid 70s and this is just another in the line of needed misinformation research papers!
A larger problem with the paper is that it uses the Hoyt-Schatten TSI reconstruction which has been completely discredited. See pages 9-11 here:
http://www.leif.org/research/TSI%20%28Reconstructions%29.pdf
Obviously the brains of the outfit was Shindell. Schmidt did the typing, Mann and Rind looked after the punctuation and graph drawing and the chick posted the paper off to get published.
Wow.. colder temps in NH Winter during low solar activity. Sounds very familiar.
Sorry.. just remembered.. add La Nina to the equation..
As “Anything” said, who needs CO2?
MET, GISS, NOAA, UEA, BOW, NIWA, IPCC, and a whole S load of ECO nut jobs.
Dave :
The list is just to long to properly answer that question. It is past time to shorten the list!
When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?
Money
“When did they lose their skill at understanding the climate?”
When they realized it wouldn’t serve to further the NEIO.
Opps, meant NIEO
Pingback: Di clima ce n'รจ uno solo! | Climate Monitor