Leif says there is no correlation between solar activity and temperature.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
Recent Comments
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- conrad ziefle on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- arn on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Joker And Midnight Toker
- ThurmanZhou on Joker And Midnight Toker
- oeman50 on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Gordon Vigurs on Joker And Midnight Toker
I agree there is no DIRECT correlation.But there has been enough evidence of phased changes going on.
I am sure that Leif could change his mind.
Spots are down, but flux is on a much diminished upward trend line so far.
Sure looks nasty to me, brrrrrr.
Graphs of solar cycle length vs temperature have something which looks awfully like correlation to me. See Fig 7.