Leif says there is no correlation between solar activity and temperature.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Disillusioned on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- conrad ziefle on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Nicholas McGinley on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
I agree there is no DIRECT correlation.But there has been enough evidence of phased changes going on.
I am sure that Leif could change his mind.
Spots are down, but flux is on a much diminished upward trend line so far.
Sure looks nasty to me, brrrrrr.
Graphs of solar cycle length vs temperature have something which looks awfully like correlation to me. See Fig 7.