University Of Michigan Reports Declining Snow Cover

By: Heather Lockwood  (No relation to Heather Locklear or Mike Lockwood)

http://www.annarbor.com/

No need to check the facts when doing global warming research.

http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=nhland&ui_season=1

 

http://climate.rutgers.edu/snowcover/chart_seasonal.php?ui_set=namgnld&ui_season=1

 

 

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to University Of Michigan Reports Declining Snow Cover

  1. Mike Davis says:

    Why ruin a good fantasy with real facts!

  2. suyts says:

    They just get more ridiculous every day. I’m really looking forward to the time when someone identifies the pathology.

  3. etudiant says:

    The study seems to focus on estimated climate forcings from the reduction in snow cover from April to May. That is a very narrow scope. It opens the paper to question as to how anything in spring can be attributed to the effect of reduced snow cover as opposed to seasonal factors.

  4. BioBob says:

    Actually, the study seems to say “our models suxor bigtime and need to be improved to better reflect reality”

    ROFL

  5. Hal says:

    From an Assistant Professor, no less.

    Good luck with that tenure thingy, Mark.

  6. Andy Weiss says:

    During the peer review process, does anyone ever bother to check the facts before publishing?

  7. His office didn’t get that memo about global warming causing more snow.

  8. PhilJourdan says:

    Weasel Word Alert: ice and snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere responded more to global warming over the last 30 years than was predicted by models

    They could be right. We do know that the models suck at predictions, so even if the response had a 10% correlation, it would probably be better than the models.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *