Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Illinois 1953 Vs. 2024
- Data Made Simple – Cold January
- Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
- Data Made Simple – Stock Prices II
- Arctic Ice-Free By 2030
- Corals To Disappear Soon
- Earth To Become Too Hot For Humans
- Defending Misinformation
- Data Made Simple – Stock Prices
- Billionaires Buying Doomed Property
- First Female President
- “not supported by the scientific consensus”
- Cooling Is Warming
- Still Spamming And Scamming
- The End Of Snow
- 117 MPH Winds In Ireland
- The End Of “Climate Action”
- Data Made Simple – Weather History Part II
- New Arctic Climate Discovered
- Airport Runways Cause Bad Weather
- Flooding Of January 1862
- Moving To Detroit To Escape Global Warming
- Visitech.ai – Data Made Simple – Weather History
- First Tracks In The Snow
- UK Green Energy Record
Recent Comments
- Alastair on Corals To Disappear Soon
- conrad ziefle on Data Made Simple – Cold January
- conrad ziefle on Illinois 1953 Vs. 2024
- conrad ziefle on Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
- Francis Barnett on Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
- dearieme on Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
- Margaret Smith on Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
- dm on Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
- Richard E Fritz on Illinois 1953 Vs. 2024
- Terry Shipman on Farewell To Climate Warrior Toto
1990 : “SATELLITE STUDY FINDS NO WARMING TREND IN ’80S”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Steve can you whip up a current giss graph and highlight the 1980-90 section. Lets see if Jimmy has been playing with his numbers.
In fact i just did it at woodfor, GISS shows a rise of 0.05Deg
The Al-Gore-rhythm they use for the models that provide the latest extrapolated surface temperatures results makes historic temperatures flexible rather than consistent as would be seen in world measurements. It is not only GISS as the pracitce goes back to the GHCN and USHCN from which other groups get their starting data to be interpreted by each groups “Independent” Method!
Considering all these datasets require some type of “homogenization” before the results are shown, I figured there was manipulation from the start. The raw data somehow isn’t accurate because it shows there was no warming? Amazing, the duplicity.
Now if only NASA will work on that pesky DJIA graph and hide those declines. Save us Jimmy!!!