Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Mike Peinsipp on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- John Francis on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
1990 : “SATELLITE STUDY FINDS NO WARMING TREND IN ’80S”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.



Steve can you whip up a current giss graph and highlight the 1980-90 section. Lets see if Jimmy has been playing with his numbers.
In fact i just did it at woodfor, GISS shows a rise of 0.05Deg
The Al-Gore-rhythm they use for the models that provide the latest extrapolated surface temperatures results makes historic temperatures flexible rather than consistent as would be seen in world measurements. It is not only GISS as the pracitce goes back to the GHCN and USHCN from which other groups get their starting data to be interpreted by each groups “Independent” Method!
Considering all these datasets require some type of “homogenization” before the results are shown, I figured there was manipulation from the start. The raw data somehow isn’t accurate because it shows there was no warming? Amazing, the duplicity.
Now if only NASA will work on that pesky DJIA graph and hide those declines. Save us Jimmy!!!