No wonder government keeps talking about the Arctic meltdown. Ice is more concentrated now than it was 15 years ago.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- Gordon Vigurs on Cheering Crowds
- arn on Cheering Crowds
- arn on Cheering Crowds
- arn on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- GW on Cheering Crowds
- Mac on Cheering Crowds
- Bob G on Cheering Crowds
Not a fair comparison because the snow and ice cover outside the Arctic and Greenland was not projected 1996.
That doesn’t take away the fact that we have massive snow and ice cover on the NH this season. Nothing to worry about.
Their region of coverage of ice hasn’t changed, which is what this article is about.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/NASA-Climate-Change/353034908075
NASA is pretty busy on Facebook LOL!
http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/2011/02/the-debunking-of-the-antarctic-warming-scare/
Big fight starting over the Antarctica hoax
What are you talking about? According to the Washington Post, the Arctic is already ice free!