http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2011/20110118_MilankovicPaper.pdf
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Mac on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
Steve,
You forgot the earlier part of the sentence in your headline”Implying the possibility of”.
Once again though you supply me with an interesting article. I certainly do learn a lot from this site!
In other words Steve forgot the scaremongering part.
Imply this, imply that, scare the people, make them feel guilty by implication and tax them to the hilt.
There we have AGW in a nutshell.
Next time don’t forget, OK Steve?
So you are saying that good settled science implies possibilities, coulds, ifs, maybes and such? LOL You guys destroy your own case every time you type a post.
”Implying the possibility of”.
Come, come Tony. They don’t imply, do they.
Tony Duncan,
There is no feeling of “possibilities” in what these global warming propagandists say. They are intent on scaring people. Get with it Tony. Drop the naiveté.
Man, you sure are working hard to get something across that just isn’t there in the real world.
Weird.. the paper doesn’t once make a consideration of current rate of sea-level rise. One would think that would be important since AGW is supposed to be affecting us right now, or at least serve as a comparator against what is supposedly going to happen.
How many times has a tipping point been predicted, which we’ve past since?
I just did a little study. I went on the NWS site for Columbus, OH. Only 7% of their 366 daily high temps have been set during the 10 years since 2000. Their records go back 140 years. That is almost exactly what it should be if there was no warming at all.
I didn’t cherry pick. I picked one station at random, a nice mid sized middle American city.
Hansen’s mind reached a tipping point a long time ago.
Baghdad Romm, Barney Fife of the left, protector of the sacred global warming propaganda.
I reach a “Tipping Point” Each day when I tip myself into bed! The globe reaches a tipping point twice a year with the two solstices. I am certain there are regional tipping that have been observed in the long term weather patterns throughout history. Anyone that has spent a fair amount of time on this planet has experienced more than one of those tipping points no matter what region you live in! Just like a see-saw the weather reaches a point and tips back towards the next trend!