http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2011/02/teleconference-will-attempt-to-explain.html
h/t to Marc Morano
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
I can’t wait to hear the circular rationalizations and the attempt to dissappear the predictions. It should be priceless.
The real danger is that research grants for self proclaimed climate “experts” will go into a death spiral. That is what they really care about.
They have made a nice living studying a fabricated issue for the last 25 years.
Unfreakingbelievable, he is never gonna stop (and it is amazing that no-one has throttled his incessant alarmism). Only Hansen has a worse case of foot-in-mouth disease. There is no way this Mark Serreze should be allowed within a thousand miles of USA taxpayer dollars. Near as I can tell, our hard-earned money is laundered through NASA and NOAA to NSIDC to pay for this character and several underlings.
I remember in one of Steve’s sea-ice posts at WUWT where one of Serreze’s lackeys, Julienne Strove was shown outing herself as a fake-scientist with the statement (paraphrased): “what would it take to be convinced of man’s influence.“, which some of us pointed out is turning the scientific method upside down, you know, by starting with a conclusion and working backwards. Arrgh. We’re paying these people to insult our intelligence! Some kind of Affirmative Action is what this is, not based on race/color/sex (which is bad enough), but AA for career under-achievers. If not that, then pure Peter Principle.
These two and Hansen really must be fired. You hear that Mark? You are an embarrassment to the scientific community. I am suggesting you, Hansen and Strove by name to my Congressman as necessary budget cuts. Maybe NSIDC is a worthy investment, I can’t say. But one thing is for sure: financing agenda driven fools is unacceptable!
/RantOff… Well on to work now to earn money to pay the oil, electric, food, gasoline, insurance, property tax, school tax, state tax, and last but not least: federal tax. The latter of which gets skimmed by the likes of these climate fools.
CO2 cause lack ofmoisture which cause oceans to spew out more water vapor, which with positive feedbacks csauses more precipitation. I have an ensemble of model that tell me that. My skillful models use PCA,RMS, RE, REM, U2 etc. to come to these conclusions
Dear Reverend Serreze:
I pulled a little silver handle on my toilet yesterday and unleashed a death spiral.
God, er, uh, Gaia only knows what terrible harm I have done to the environment.
Have I kilt the Poley Bears with this selfish act? Please advise.