Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
Hmmmm, why does this number ’30’ years keep popping up again and again? I’ve seen it before.
Well, without the benefit of a fat federal grant I can say this: when there is finally enough data plotted, including weather events and climate shifts (like all this data Steve is turning up), we will then discover a magic number or range of numbers that will center around thirty. This will be akin to a Rosetta Stone. Such a magic number will not be found in a model (how could it?), instead it will be found in actual observations of course.