Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “records going back to 1961”
- Disillusioned on “records going back to 1961”
- Mike on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Mike on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Mike on “records going back to 1961”
- John Francis on “records going back to 1961”
- Gordon Vigurs on “records going back to 1961”
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
Hmmmm, why does this number ’30’ years keep popping up again and again? I’ve seen it before.
Well, without the benefit of a fat federal grant I can say this: when there is finally enough data plotted, including weather events and climate shifts (like all this data Steve is turning up), we will then discover a magic number or range of numbers that will center around thirty. This will be akin to a Rosetta Stone. Such a magic number will not be found in a model (how could it?), instead it will be found in actual observations of course.