Do you have demonstrate that you are a complete moron to get a government climate science job? How many references are required?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
And now the Sherpas have garnered some of this expertise as well.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/7763595/Global-warming-is-making-Mount-Everest-more-dangerous-to-climb.html
Oh Brother. “Global Warming (insert future-tense verb here)(insert threatened activity/process/cultural festival here)more(insert disasterous adjective here)than before!!!!
Steve,
Take a look at this:
“Time’s Up: Lack of global warming has falsified the climate computer models”
“According to the NOAA State of the Climate 2008 report, climate computer model simulations show that if observations find that the globe has not warmed for periods of 15 years or more, the climate models predicting man-made warming from CO2 will be falsified at a confidence level of 95%:….”
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2011/03/times-up-lack-of-global-warming-has.html
NOAA
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/2008/ann/bams/full-report.pdf
Global warming over the past few decades has devastated the boreal forests. /end sarc.
We have had over 30 years of warming and trees respond by expanding. What further evidence do we need to show that we are dealing with a bunch of delusional gullibles?
H/t Tom Nelson
Steve,
Good thing that the IPCC was honest enough to admit it was wrong about this. Too bad other people aren’t willing to admit when they are completely wrong about something.
Pathetic
What do you want to get off your chest Tony?
Climate astrologers are a protected racket. You can error by over 100% on a future forecast and then receive awards and be praised as a hero and the greatest climate astrologer that ever walked the feverish Earth.
Ooh, tell me more about “The world of fungi” in the sidebar there.
Bound to be more interesting and accurate, but probably not as laughable.
lol, no it wouldn’t, but I’ll tell you what is…….. I don’t frequent your site much and hadn’t been there for some time, so, when seeing your “SPASSFABRIK” button and instructions, I dutifully clicked……. lol I’M AT WORK!!!! There should be warning labels!!!! ahahahahahahahaa
No problem, suyts.
Fomenting a near crisis at the office? Glad I could help. 😉
Could still happen, it’s not 2035 yet
Post again in 2034.
Andy
No it won’t. Not even close.
You must have a Tardis and a sonic screw driver Steve!
If it’s not 50 years ago in the newspapers it’s 30 years ago in the future! No newspapers though for that, even google cannot do that.
I’d like to do a guest post on the Arctic and Antarctic, nothing too scientific, just a layman’s view, what do you say? At least it is in the present.
Andy
Hi Andy
Hope you include the Baltic Sea in your post.
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2011/03/nuke-to-rescue.html
Andy unless you know the altitude of all the glaciers and then can calculate the lapse rate temperature for each you cannot know if the glaciers will be gone because of global warming.
“When a mass of air is lifted, it cools at the dry adiabatic lapse rate of 5 1/2°F per 1,000 feet…”
At some alttitude it is always below freezing so some glaciers will never melt due to global warming.