2.5+ metres thick
3+ metres thick
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
the poley bears are going to be pissed……….
kill the bears
save the seals
😉
That’s an amazing amount of thick growth.
Isn’t the area that shows 4-5 meters thick where all of the hot and incredible mildness has been?
Yep, exactly
It looks like the wind piled it up again, and that’s where it’s getting thicker/quicker….
….but if the wind was blowing that way, wouldn’t it have blow cold water that way too??
If so, where did that slightly warmer than normal anomaly come from?
Indeed. I wonder when the last time that thermometer was calibrated? Or maybe Anthony has some insights to the sighting of the thermometer.
The wind? Yes, I think that’s likely or an artifact of the AO. But how does that equate to warmer? It certainly wasn’t a warm breeze, and the water shouldn’t have been the cause of the relative warmth., IDK……. any breeze coming off of that ice pack should have been very cold.
Every once in a while, I think about really digging in and doing some climate work and figuring this stuff out……..obviously its too much to ask from the people we pay, but then I remember the grief gained and the time spent by people like Steve Mac, and, as I draw another swallow of beer, I recollect, I don’t really care if its warmer or colder or icier on the north side of
Greenlandhell. 🙂suyts says:
March 8, 2011 at 9:06 pm
That’s an amazing amount of thick growth.
That is what one can expect when warming accelerates.
lol, RealScience makes climate discovery!!!! Exceptional warmth causes thick ice!!!!
This makes me wonder about the speculation of runaway feedback loop amplification. Will it or won’t it happen? Let’s hope this bodes well for the September minimum melt.
Bob Tisdale’s latest Arctic ocean SST anomaly is graph is interesting.
http://i54.tinypic.com/2vsrtyx.jpg
Heat content has declined except for spikes that may be related to heat released by the thickening ice.
Why do they color it green? Is ice green? Same as doppler radar maps of rain… why green? Why not… I don’t know white for snow, blue for ice, and… and… clear for rain? Hmm??
the bears will be in trouble, that thicker ice means they have to dig deeper to get a nice warm seal …../sarc off..
The last NSIDC monthly update seemed to indicate it might well stay in place this summer and not be moved out so next year could be even thicker.
Andy
As I predicted many months ago.
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2010/09/11/how-much-multi-year-ice-in-2011/