But just for them. Not for the peasantry.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Well that makes it official. The leftists are out of the closet in trying to re-create the very system we fought a revolution to destroy: a system of classes where the ruling class is armed and the working class is disarmed.
Keep it up. No really, keep it up.
Considering most of them are loonier than Saturday Morning Cartoon, that is the only way they can carry them. They would fail all background checks if subjected to them like everyone else.
The ruling class speaks again – and of course the rest of us lose.
If you think your past is too sordid for a run at congress, think again:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_US_senators_and_congressmen_are_convicted_felons
How can that protect them from rifle fire?
I’m sure the LA Times will no doubt be writing about the paranoia of white Democrats clinging to their guns and religion and being NRA zombies.
Wouldn’t it be safer to wear bullet proof vests than give them guns? Seems like that would save more politicans lifes. You can’t exactly kill yourself accidentally with a bullet proof vest, I can imagine a politician could with a gun though 😉
Andy
You’re not in the States are you? (just wondering). No doubt many politicians wear vests already, note however that the citizens often times cannot because in many places items like bullet-proof vests are just as illegal as firearms. In those places the do-gooders also limit knife size, ban switchblades, nunchakus, night vision equipment, electric stun guns, even mace.
Their goal is for an inferior armed population compared to the ruling class, a goal they have already achieved in many places. They do not care about home invasions, or if women get raped and cannot defend themselves. They are mere sacrifices on the alter of liberalism. Many of them used to say: only the police and military should have guns. These days they are a little more shy about it.
The question of whether it is or is not a good idea for Americans to carry weapons is above my pay grade. I can see merit in both sides of the argument and have no desire to tell people what they should do (on this topic, anyway).
However the reading of the second amendment as a general treatise on gun ownership, rather than the need for militia, seem to me to stretch the language somewhat.
I know this is an emotive subject, and I don’t want to start a war, but could somebody please explain their reading of the second amendment to this poor ignorant Aussie?
Not judging, just trying to understand.
No, just the punctuation. Read it again, and keep in mind the punctuation. The Militia part is a clause, the right comes after the clause and is (supposed to be) inviolate outside of an additional amendment.