http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110306/climate-change-impact-110306/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mann Says He Was Correct
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
Obviously their ecological models suck just as much as their climate models.
Isn’t it just amazing that everything, every aspect, every detail, every effect on humans and the animals and the plants by a little bit of warming are ALL BAD? It beggars the imagination.
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
Ever wonder why so many people retire to Florida? Because it cold?
That is one of my biggest beefs with the CAGW hoax. If the Earth was warming up the effects should be fairly equally distributed between benign, beneficial, and malevolent, but all we hear is that it would be univesrsally catastrophic.
Anyway you can’t even parody the CAGW claims. World to end. Women, minorities, and the poor hardest hit.
CO2 is a rich, racist, chauvinistic, right-wing molecule. So, when you get more of them, the results are predictable.
Charles Higley says:
March 7, 2011 at 2:53 am
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
It’s easier to boil all evil down to one thing. You don’t have to actually take the time and sort everything out. It’s kinda like how some people boil Middle East relations down to one word, Halliburton. It’s all easy to figure out then like a corny political George Clooney movie.
I think you meant to say ‘febrile.’
Climate change impacts those least responsible….
Oh how true. But if only they would tell the real story, the real impacts, that those least responsible are dying of starvation from biofuel programs.
@Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
March 7, 2011 at 3:12 am
In one, good comment.
“World to end tomorrow — women, children, minorities, poor and GLBT to suffer the most”
HIV was said to be the first virus with civil rights. I guess CO2 must be the first molecule guilty of hate crimes.
If you are rich and/or successful, you are evil and should be guilt ridden. How dare you enjoy life more than the “most vulnerable” of the world (anyone other than a straight white male)!