http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110306/climate-change-impact-110306/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Obviously their ecological models suck just as much as their climate models.
Isn’t it just amazing that everything, every aspect, every detail, every effect on humans and the animals and the plants by a little bit of warming are ALL BAD? It beggars the imagination.
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
Ever wonder why so many people retire to Florida? Because it cold?
That is one of my biggest beefs with the CAGW hoax. If the Earth was warming up the effects should be fairly equally distributed between benign, beneficial, and malevolent, but all we hear is that it would be univesrsally catastrophic.
Anyway you can’t even parody the CAGW claims. World to end. Women, minorities, and the poor hardest hit.
CO2 is a rich, racist, chauvinistic, right-wing molecule. So, when you get more of them, the results are predictable.
Charles Higley says:
March 7, 2011 at 2:53 am
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
It’s easier to boil all evil down to one thing. You don’t have to actually take the time and sort everything out. It’s kinda like how some people boil Middle East relations down to one word, Halliburton. It’s all easy to figure out then like a corny political George Clooney movie.
I think you meant to say ‘febrile.’
Climate change impacts those least responsible….
Oh how true. But if only they would tell the real story, the real impacts, that those least responsible are dying of starvation from biofuel programs.
@Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
March 7, 2011 at 3:12 am
In one, good comment.
“World to end tomorrow — women, children, minorities, poor and GLBT to suffer the most”
HIV was said to be the first virus with civil rights. I guess CO2 must be the first molecule guilty of hate crimes.
If you are rich and/or successful, you are evil and should be guilt ridden. How dare you enjoy life more than the “most vulnerable” of the world (anyone other than a straight white male)!