http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110306/climate-change-impact-110306/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
Recent Comments
- BenV on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Peter Carroll on Worst March Drought On Record
- GW on El Nino To The Rescue?
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue?
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- Francis Barnett on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- dearieme on Worst March Drought On Record
Obviously their ecological models suck just as much as their climate models.
Isn’t it just amazing that everything, every aspect, every detail, every effect on humans and the animals and the plants by a little bit of warming are ALL BAD? It beggars the imagination.
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
Ever wonder why so many people retire to Florida? Because it cold?
That is one of my biggest beefs with the CAGW hoax. If the Earth was warming up the effects should be fairly equally distributed between benign, beneficial, and malevolent, but all we hear is that it would be univesrsally catastrophic.
Anyway you can’t even parody the CAGW claims. World to end. Women, minorities, and the poor hardest hit.
CO2 is a rich, racist, chauvinistic, right-wing molecule. So, when you get more of them, the results are predictable.
Charles Higley says:
March 7, 2011 at 2:53 am
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
It’s easier to boil all evil down to one thing. You don’t have to actually take the time and sort everything out. It’s kinda like how some people boil Middle East relations down to one word, Halliburton. It’s all easy to figure out then like a corny political George Clooney movie.
I think you meant to say ‘febrile.’
Climate change impacts those least responsible….
Oh how true. But if only they would tell the real story, the real impacts, that those least responsible are dying of starvation from biofuel programs.
@Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
March 7, 2011 at 3:12 am
In one, good comment.
“World to end tomorrow — women, children, minorities, poor and GLBT to suffer the most”
HIV was said to be the first virus with civil rights. I guess CO2 must be the first molecule guilty of hate crimes.
If you are rich and/or successful, you are evil and should be guilt ridden. How dare you enjoy life more than the “most vulnerable” of the world (anyone other than a straight white male)!