http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/TopStories/20110306/climate-change-impact-110306/
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
Recent Comments
- GW on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- GW on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- arn on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Denis Rushworth on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Earth, Wind And Fire
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Robertvd on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse


Obviously their ecological models suck just as much as their climate models.
Isn’t it just amazing that everything, every aspect, every detail, every effect on humans and the animals and the plants by a little bit of warming are ALL BAD? It beggars the imagination.
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
Ever wonder why so many people retire to Florida? Because it cold?
That is one of my biggest beefs with the CAGW hoax. If the Earth was warming up the effects should be fairly equally distributed between benign, beneficial, and malevolent, but all we hear is that it would be univesrsally catastrophic.
Anyway you can’t even parody the CAGW claims. World to end. Women, minorities, and the poor hardest hit.
CO2 is a rich, racist, chauvinistic, right-wing molecule. So, when you get more of them, the results are predictable.
Charles Higley says:
March 7, 2011 at 2:53 am
Of course, the claims are all from fertile, paranoid, mostly low integrity and/low low functioning minds.
It’s easier to boil all evil down to one thing. You don’t have to actually take the time and sort everything out. It’s kinda like how some people boil Middle East relations down to one word, Halliburton. It’s all easy to figure out then like a corny political George Clooney movie.
I think you meant to say ‘febrile.’
Climate change impacts those least responsible….
Oh how true. But if only they would tell the real story, the real impacts, that those least responsible are dying of starvation from biofuel programs.
@Amino Acids in Meteorites says:
March 7, 2011 at 3:12 am
In one, good comment.
“World to end tomorrow — women, children, minorities, poor and GLBT to suffer the most”
HIV was said to be the first virus with civil rights. I guess CO2 must be the first molecule guilty of hate crimes.
If you are rich and/or successful, you are evil and should be guilt ridden. How dare you enjoy life more than the “most vulnerable” of the world (anyone other than a straight white male)!