How about he stops one tornado (or even a drop of rain) first, before he takes on the whole climate? He can’t change the weather this afternoon, but he can predict and control the climate in 100 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
Not sure how much “policymakers” will like being talked to using “everyday concepts already in use in the insurance industry”…
Anyway, the answer is simple: “the greater the uncertainty, the greater the risk“? The greater the risk to do something stupid that would make the situation worse. Everybody should know by now that the Titanic might have survived a direct head-on hit against the iceberg, and in hindsight nobody should have slowed that ship down, or tried to change course.
I’m not sure why people can’t learn from history, but they don’t. And this climate argument is particularly bizarre. They wish climate to remain the same…..ostensibly so our lives will remain manageable, and we’re not forced to immediate adaptation. To obtain this, they insist on immediate action and adaptation.
Regardless of the validity of their views, this lack of logic requires I reject their assertions.
it’s worse than that. ..they insist on mitigation not adaptation thereby guaranteeing to select the worst possible course of action
it’s like if the captain of the Titanic had proposed against the threat of icebergs to send a letter to other ship captains running the same lanes asking them to drop buckets of warm water overboard
It’s Even worse than THAT, my friends. Their mitigation plan to the possible collision of the Titanic with an iceburg
is to jump naked into the frigid North Atlantic to escape the impact.
I know!! whatever happened to “adapting” to your environment? I won’t feel sorry for them when the SHTF
Baghdad Romm
One measly trillion? On the latest calc that is worth all of 0.0005 C.
Chicken feed.
I am completely uncertain whether the flesh eating Martians will land tomorrow, so as a precution we need to shoot 99.9 percent of the earths population so that there isn’t enough fresh, juicy flesh to be bothered stopping for.