Non-believers must be purged – for the sake of future generations. Faith in Gaia is needed to save the planet. Perhaps a Spanish Inquisition is in order?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Bob G on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Allan Shelton on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Gordon Vigurs on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Fred Harwood on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- arn on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
That has got to be the most frightening article I have read for some time. My response? You first!
Well, I think someone who is chaiman of an environmental consultancy and of a big business environment and water company is not going to look so closely at the science that costs his businesses a great deal of lost business.
Mr Gummer, Lord Deben, you should read Spencer & Braswell 2010, Lindzen & Choi 2009 and if you accept peer reviewed science in reputable journals, you should then accept that “cutting emissions dramatically” not only doesn’t “avert real disaster” (since CO2 related climate sensitivity is very low) but causes real disaster in the form of a great depression that would make the 1930’s seem like losing a game of pool.
One of the reasons I’m a sceptic is the ability of AGW people to delude themselves about the principle cause of problems. In their minds, nearly every bad thing that happens is due to AGW and the lack of success reducing CO2 is the fault of sceptics.
The question for Mr Gummer is did he walk to Australia? Can I hope he might stay there?
Easy for you to say. We Aussies want him to go away.