Non-believers must be purged – for the sake of future generations. Faith in Gaia is needed to save the planet. Perhaps a Spanish Inquisition is in order?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Jack the Insider on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- John Francis on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Terry Shipman on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Gamecock on “Earlier Than Usual”
That has got to be the most frightening article I have read for some time. My response? You first!
Well, I think someone who is chaiman of an environmental consultancy and of a big business environment and water company is not going to look so closely at the science that costs his businesses a great deal of lost business.
Mr Gummer, Lord Deben, you should read Spencer & Braswell 2010, Lindzen & Choi 2009 and if you accept peer reviewed science in reputable journals, you should then accept that “cutting emissions dramatically” not only doesn’t “avert real disaster” (since CO2 related climate sensitivity is very low) but causes real disaster in the form of a great depression that would make the 1930’s seem like losing a game of pool.
One of the reasons I’m a sceptic is the ability of AGW people to delude themselves about the principle cause of problems. In their minds, nearly every bad thing that happens is due to AGW and the lack of success reducing CO2 is the fault of sceptics.
The question for Mr Gummer is did he walk to Australia? Can I hope he might stay there?
Easy for you to say. We Aussies want him to go away.