Non-believers must be purged – for the sake of future generations. Faith in Gaia is needed to save the planet. Perhaps a Spanish Inquisition is in order?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
That has got to be the most frightening article I have read for some time. My response? You first!
Well, I think someone who is chaiman of an environmental consultancy and of a big business environment and water company is not going to look so closely at the science that costs his businesses a great deal of lost business.
Mr Gummer, Lord Deben, you should read Spencer & Braswell 2010, Lindzen & Choi 2009 and if you accept peer reviewed science in reputable journals, you should then accept that “cutting emissions dramatically” not only doesn’t “avert real disaster” (since CO2 related climate sensitivity is very low) but causes real disaster in the form of a great depression that would make the 1930’s seem like losing a game of pool.
One of the reasons I’m a sceptic is the ability of AGW people to delude themselves about the principle cause of problems. In their minds, nearly every bad thing that happens is due to AGW and the lack of success reducing CO2 is the fault of sceptics.
The question for Mr Gummer is did he walk to Australia? Can I hope he might stay there?
Easy for you to say. We Aussies want him to go away.