Non-believers must be purged – for the sake of future generations. Faith in Gaia is needed to save the planet. Perhaps a Spanish Inquisition is in order?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
That has got to be the most frightening article I have read for some time. My response? You first!
Well, I think someone who is chaiman of an environmental consultancy and of a big business environment and water company is not going to look so closely at the science that costs his businesses a great deal of lost business.
Mr Gummer, Lord Deben, you should read Spencer & Braswell 2010, Lindzen & Choi 2009 and if you accept peer reviewed science in reputable journals, you should then accept that “cutting emissions dramatically” not only doesn’t “avert real disaster” (since CO2 related climate sensitivity is very low) but causes real disaster in the form of a great depression that would make the 1930’s seem like losing a game of pool.
One of the reasons I’m a sceptic is the ability of AGW people to delude themselves about the principle cause of problems. In their minds, nearly every bad thing that happens is due to AGW and the lack of success reducing CO2 is the fault of sceptics.
The question for Mr Gummer is did he walk to Australia? Can I hope he might stay there?
Easy for you to say. We Aussies want him to go away.