IPCC says that all the glaciers will be gone in 24 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Sigh……. back to the Himalayan mountains? Geez, climate alarmism is reduced to the equivalent of sequels of bad movies.
Coming soon to a science journal near you! Escape of the Arctic Ice part XXIV!!!!
On a not entirely off topic discussion, John Christy hammers alarmists in his written testimony to congress……..
“The non-falsifiable hypotheses works this way, “whatever happens is consistent with my hypothesis.” In other words, there is no event that would “falsify” the hypothesis. As such, these assertions cannot be considered science or in anyway informative since the hypothesis’ fundamental prediction is “anything may happen.” In the example above if winters become milder or they become snowier, the hypothesis stands. This is not science. As noted above, there are innumerable types of events that can be defined as extreme events – so for the enterprising individual (unencumbered by the scientific method), weather statistics can supply an almost unlimited set of targets in which to discover a “useful” extreme event.”
http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Energy/030811/Christy.pdf
emphasis mine.
Just scroll through the pictures from haze, dust, smoke, fires and volcanic eruptions at the following pages and tell me how much is man made?
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/category.php?cat_id=7
and
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/category.php?cat_id=12
It’s time the IPCC is shut up and down.
We are fed up with their hog wash science and scare mongering.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/07/helmut-schmidt-calls-for-ipcc-inquiry/
LOL at James……….
You can see the soot in any of the shots over India.
http://soundngo.com/userfiles/image/india-pollution.jpg
And much of that evil soot comes from the United States!!!