IPCC says that all the glaciers will be gone in 24 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Bob G on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Bob G on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Tony Heller on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Scissor on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Scissor on Diversity Is Our Strength
- conrad ziefle on Diversity Is Our Strength
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Crashex on 60 Years Of Progress in London
Sigh……. back to the Himalayan mountains? Geez, climate alarmism is reduced to the equivalent of sequels of bad movies.
Coming soon to a science journal near you! Escape of the Arctic Ice part XXIV!!!!
On a not entirely off topic discussion, John Christy hammers alarmists in his written testimony to congress……..
“The non-falsifiable hypotheses works this way, “whatever happens is consistent with my hypothesis.” In other words, there is no event that would “falsify” the hypothesis. As such, these assertions cannot be considered science or in anyway informative since the hypothesis’ fundamental prediction is “anything may happen.” In the example above if winters become milder or they become snowier, the hypothesis stands. This is not science. As noted above, there are innumerable types of events that can be defined as extreme events – so for the enterprising individual (unencumbered by the scientific method), weather statistics can supply an almost unlimited set of targets in which to discover a “useful” extreme event.”
http://republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/Media/file/Hearings/Energy/030811/Christy.pdf
emphasis mine.
Just scroll through the pictures from haze, dust, smoke, fires and volcanic eruptions at the following pages and tell me how much is man made?
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/category.php?cat_id=7
and
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/category.php?cat_id=12
It’s time the IPCC is shut up and down.
We are fed up with their hog wash science and scare mongering.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/07/helmut-schmidt-calls-for-ipcc-inquiry/
LOL at James……….
You can see the soot in any of the shots over India.
http://soundngo.com/userfiles/image/india-pollution.jpg
And much of that evil soot comes from the United States!!!