Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
Recent Comments
- william on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Bob G on UK Net Zero
- arn on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- conrad ziefle on One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Ulric Lyons on Erasing 1921
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on Plant Food
- gordon vigurs on “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- arn on UK Net Zero
“the general purpose of the (Economist) is to ignore any and all facts that might contradict their obsession with “global warming””
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“The Economist” is like smutty magazines, a (usually brief) period in everybody’s life. The day one “graduates” away from it, it’s another step towards adulthood.
No doubt.
Has the Economist invested in green carbon renewable schemes. The BBC has invested in carbon schemes so I can understand their desperation?” For the record I used to work for the BBC.
The SCAM is being undone one bit at a time.