Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 1970 – The Beginning Of Time
- Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- ‘malice toward the planet’
- Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Ice Free Glacier National Park
- Climate Comedy Cancelled
- Warmest March On Record
- New Climate Metric
- Bad-Faith Trial Misconduct
- Food And Energy Experts
- “Are We Imagining It?”
- The Suffragettes
- Michael Mann Upset
- A Serious Problem
- Miami Drowning
- No Longer The Greatest Existential Threat
- Almost Unanimous Consensus Of Scientists
- Maryland To Drown
- Rapid Virus Mutation
- Wisconsin To Save The Planet
- Magical Musk
- “Scientists Forecast”
- “thing of the past” update
- Defunding The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Ulric Lyons on Hiding The Heat Of 1934
- arn on New Climate Metric
- william on New Climate Metric
- Alastair on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- arn on New Climate Metric
- arn on ‘malice toward the planet’
- Bob G on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- dearieme on Fraudster Fighting Climate Misinformation
- Mike Peinsipp on Final Score For The Inflation Reduction Act
- Billyjack on Ice Free Glacier National Park
“the general purpose of the (Economist) is to ignore any and all facts that might contradict their obsession with “global warming””
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
“The Economist” is like smutty magazines, a (usually brief) period in everybody’s life. The day one “graduates” away from it, it’s another step towards adulthood.
No doubt.
Has the Economist invested in green carbon renewable schemes. The BBC has invested in carbon schemes so I can understand their desperation?” For the record I used to work for the BBC.
The SCAM is being undone one bit at a time.