Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Greenland Meltdown Scam
- conrad ziefle on Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Terry Shipman on Wyoming Gold
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on Wyoming Gold
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Robertvd on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
“the general purpose of the (Economist) is to ignore any and all facts that might contradict their obsession with “global warming””
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.


“The Economist” is like smutty magazines, a (usually brief) period in everybody’s life. The day one “graduates” away from it, it’s another step towards adulthood.
No doubt.
Has the Economist invested in green carbon renewable schemes. The BBC has invested in carbon schemes so I can understand their desperation?” For the record I used to work for the BBC.
The SCAM is being undone one bit at a time.