warming of more than 0.25°F (0.14°C) has been measured since 2000
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Mann Says He Was Correct
- conrad ziefle on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Mike Peinsipp on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Disillusioned on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Gamecock on Mann Says He Was Correct
- toorightmate on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Robert Denby on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Michael Abbott on “under the Intermediate Scenario”
Its worse than that, even. I thought that maybe they were using the outlier(GISS), so I went to GISS and looked, nope, not even close to .25 C. So then I thought maybe at the time of publication (the pdf) that it was possible for the .25 C. So, I looked for a date. On the pdf, for those that can’t follow,………….( downloads.climatescience.gov/ Literacy /Climate%20Literacy%20Booklet%20Low-Res.pdf I broke the link so this would post, just remove the spaces and put http in front.) Click find, “2000” and you’ll find the quote. On page one, I found this, “Second Version: March 2009 http://www.climatescience.gov“. So what does GISS say about March 2009?
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/trend
Not even close. Least squares trend line; slope = 0.0114567 per year
Once again, we find our government is intentionally misleading its populace.
A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy, or perhaps both.——–James Madison
lol, not .25 C, but .25 F.
But, in either case, it still doesn’t get there from here.
yes and no.
The Giss temp’s which they use do show a minuscule non-relevant increase.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2001/plot/gistemp/from:2001/trend
The truth is that most of the data sets disagree with Hansen. The truth is that Hansen has severe conflicts of interest.
Yeh, but still not 0.25.
Damn……. I actually put in 3 links…….. moderation hell!!!!
Regardless of how they count angels on the head of a pin, .25 F is probably still within the margin of error and certainly not statisitically meaningful.
This isn’t the only place they need to fess up. The Donald wants to see the Birth Certificate. Sounds like he wants to fire someone.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52064.html
Morning Steve, well to me it is.
Met seems to have Feb 2011 at +0.267C!
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/hadcrut3.html
Funny, the CRU site http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/ that normally gives the data before the Met seems to have gone crook, but hey, what’s new.