warming of more than 0.25°F (0.14°C) has been measured since 2000
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- dm on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- dm on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- D. Boss on IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
Its worse than that, even. I thought that maybe they were using the outlier(GISS), so I went to GISS and looked, nope, not even close to .25 C. So then I thought maybe at the time of publication (the pdf) that it was possible for the .25 C. So, I looked for a date. On the pdf, for those that can’t follow,………….( downloads.climatescience.gov/ Literacy /Climate%20Literacy%20Booklet%20Low-Res.pdf I broke the link so this would post, just remove the spaces and put http in front.) Click find, “2000” and you’ll find the quote. On page one, I found this, “Second Version: March 2009 http://www.climatescience.gov“. So what does GISS say about March 2009?
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/trend
Not even close. Least squares trend line; slope = 0.0114567 per year
Once again, we find our government is intentionally misleading its populace.
A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy, or perhaps both.——–James Madison
lol, not .25 C, but .25 F.
But, in either case, it still doesn’t get there from here.
yes and no.
The Giss temp’s which they use do show a minuscule non-relevant increase.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2001/plot/gistemp/from:2001/trend
The truth is that most of the data sets disagree with Hansen. The truth is that Hansen has severe conflicts of interest.
Yeh, but still not 0.25.
Damn……. I actually put in 3 links…….. moderation hell!!!!
Regardless of how they count angels on the head of a pin, .25 F is probably still within the margin of error and certainly not statisitically meaningful.
This isn’t the only place they need to fess up. The Donald wants to see the Birth Certificate. Sounds like he wants to fire someone.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52064.html
Morning Steve, well to me it is.
Met seems to have Feb 2011 at +0.267C!
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/hadcrut3.html
Funny, the CRU site http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/ that normally gives the data before the Met seems to have gone crook, but hey, what’s new.