warming of more than 0.25°F (0.14°C) has been measured since 2000
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Dayna on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
Its worse than that, even. I thought that maybe they were using the outlier(GISS), so I went to GISS and looked, nope, not even close to .25 C. So then I thought maybe at the time of publication (the pdf) that it was possible for the .25 C. So, I looked for a date. On the pdf, for those that can’t follow,………….( downloads.climatescience.gov/ Literacy /Climate%20Literacy%20Booklet%20Low-Res.pdf I broke the link so this would post, just remove the spaces and put http in front.) Click find, “2000” and you’ll find the quote. On page one, I found this, “Second Version: March 2009 http://www.climatescience.gov“. So what does GISS say about March 2009?
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/trend
Not even close. Least squares trend line; slope = 0.0114567 per year
Once again, we find our government is intentionally misleading its populace.
A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy, or perhaps both.——–James Madison
lol, not .25 C, but .25 F.
But, in either case, it still doesn’t get there from here.
yes and no.
The Giss temp’s which they use do show a minuscule non-relevant increase.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2001/plot/gistemp/from:2001/trend
The truth is that most of the data sets disagree with Hansen. The truth is that Hansen has severe conflicts of interest.
Yeh, but still not 0.25.
Damn……. I actually put in 3 links…….. moderation hell!!!!
Regardless of how they count angels on the head of a pin, .25 F is probably still within the margin of error and certainly not statisitically meaningful.
This isn’t the only place they need to fess up. The Donald wants to see the Birth Certificate. Sounds like he wants to fire someone.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52064.html
Morning Steve, well to me it is.
Met seems to have Feb 2011 at +0.267C!
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/hadcrut3.html
Funny, the CRU site http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/ that normally gives the data before the Met seems to have gone crook, but hey, what’s new.