warming of more than 0.25°F (0.14°C) has been measured since 2000
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
Its worse than that, even. I thought that maybe they were using the outlier(GISS), so I went to GISS and looked, nope, not even close to .25 C. So then I thought maybe at the time of publication (the pdf) that it was possible for the .25 C. So, I looked for a date. On the pdf, for those that can’t follow,………….( downloads.climatescience.gov/ Literacy /Climate%20Literacy%20Booklet%20Low-Res.pdf I broke the link so this would post, just remove the spaces and put http in front.) Click find, “2000” and you’ll find the quote. On page one, I found this, “Second Version: March 2009 http://www.climatescience.gov“. So what does GISS say about March 2009?
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/plot/gistemp/from:2000/to:2009.17/trend
Not even close. Least squares trend line; slope = 0.0114567 per year
Once again, we find our government is intentionally misleading its populace.
A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce, or a tragedy, or perhaps both.——–James Madison
lol, not .25 C, but .25 F.
But, in either case, it still doesn’t get there from here.
yes and no.
The Giss temp’s which they use do show a minuscule non-relevant increase.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from:2001/plot/gistemp/from:2001/trend
The truth is that most of the data sets disagree with Hansen. The truth is that Hansen has severe conflicts of interest.
Yeh, but still not 0.25.
Damn……. I actually put in 3 links…….. moderation hell!!!!
Regardless of how they count angels on the head of a pin, .25 F is probably still within the margin of error and certainly not statisitically meaningful.
This isn’t the only place they need to fess up. The Donald wants to see the Birth Certificate. Sounds like he wants to fire someone.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/52064.html
Morning Steve, well to me it is.
Met seems to have Feb 2011 at +0.267C!
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/climatechange/science/monitoring/hadcrut3.html
Funny, the CRU site http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/ that normally gives the data before the Met seems to have gone crook, but hey, what’s new.