Why the UN can never stop climate change
On Sunday in Thailand diplomats opened another round of formal United Nations talks on global warming. For more than 20 years, the UN has been working on this problem, with little progress. Expectations have never been lower. The December 2009 conference in Copenhagen that was supposed to finalise a new treaty to replace the expiring Kyoto protocol ended in deadlock. Last year’s talks in Cancún ended without agreement on most of the important new issues.
Some of the troubles with global warming diplomacy are unavoidable. Stopping climate change is one of the hardest challenges the international community has undertaken. The main cause of climate change, emissions of carbon dioxide, is intrinsic to the burning of fossil fuels that power the world economy. Even in the best of circumstances, getting off carbon will take decades and trillions of dollars. The world economic crisis makes that even harder as few societies choose to spend money on distant problems when they face more immediate challenges such as unemployment and poverty.
More progress will come from shifting efforts on three fronts. First, while the UN talks should not be abandoned, most diplomacy should shift to smaller forums which engage just the largest countries. In fact, 10 countries (treating the EU as one) account for nearly four-fifths of all warming emissions. Working with those 10 will be complicated enough. That group of big polluters includes some that are willing to devote massive resources to the problem, such as the EU, and others that are a lot more reluctant – among them, China and the United States. The enthusiastic nations have been the biggest backers of the UN approach because they are best able to make strict, binding agreements. But what works for the EU fails for most of the rest of the world that is more skittish about binding commitments that they might not be able to honor.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Gell-Mann Amnesia effect”
- Socialism Couldn’t Save The Glaciers
- Record Slow Ice Melt
- “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Latest Research In Climate Science
- UK Sucking Carbon
- Price-Free Tesla
- Four Years Past The Deadline
- Cooling Minnesota
- UK Net Zero
- Erasing 1921
- “the world’s most eminent climate scientists”
- Warming Toledo
- One Year Left To Save The Planet
- Cold Hurricanes
- Plant Food
- President Trump Gets Every Question Right
- The Inflation Reduction Act
- Saving The Ecosystem
- Two Weeks Past The End Of The World
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
Recent Comments
- gordon vigurs on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Bob G on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- Bob G on Socialism Couldn’t Save The Glaciers
- Bob G on Record Slow Ice Melt
- gordon vigurs on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- gordon vigurs on Four Years Past The Deadline
- conrad ziefle on Latest Research In Climate Science
- Gamecock on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- william on “I’m from the Government, and I’m here to help”
- arn on UK Sucking Carbon
lol, the author describes the EU as a bunch of lemmings.
Not everyone is completely happy about participating in this Kool Aide party.
Unfortunately EU nations have given away most of their powers to govern to the unelected and unaccountable EU bureaucracy in Brussels.
Consequently the EU can force through unpopular policies without having to worry about public opinion.
I guarantee that this will fail.
Maybe they can take on Continental Drift as well resulting in a reduction in volcanoes, earthquakes and tsunamis. Why not dream big if you are living in your own alternate reality.