Skate (SSN-578), surfaced at the North Pole, 17 March 1959
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Bob G on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Jimmy Haigh on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- czechlist on 60 Years Of Progress in London
March??………………
But we all know the NH ice was much healthier back then…Tamino showed it!
http://tamino.wordpress.com/2010/10/16/history-of-arctic-and-antarctic-sea-ice-part-1/
What I love is how he claims that the SH ice has dropped a ton from 1940 to the last 1970s, but that claim is in apparent conflict with his claim at another time that modern global warming started in 1975.
-Scott
Seadragon US submarine at North Pole 1962
http://navsource.org/archives/08/0858411.jpg
HMS Investigator got trapped in ice on the last leg of the North West Passage in 1853
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38459028/ns/technology_and_science-science/
ummmm, March of 1959 you say? Just around the peak Arctic extent.
I wonder what it looked like up there that year in September.
Sereze? Julienne? Bueller? Anyone?
the poor bears…or is it polar bears?
We should be wary of Arctic ice claims until the satellite data will be able to show the polynyas
It’s a nice bright day in that picture, normally it is dark around that time of year at the North Pole isn’t it?
The sun would be just coming up, and it looks foggy.
Yes, that would explain it. I wondered if they had used another “library” photo which had more water in it than they actually encountered. Certainly a lot of water there for that time of year.
Andy
Pingback: 24 Hours of Climate Reality: Gore-a-thon – Hour 10 | Watts Up With That?